AI Rate Professor

Gender Studies

Jessica Albi

GNDR100 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

; students report and almost no support for the workload.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderPoor communicationUnclear instructionsHarsh project gradingAvoid
  • Every review rates quality at 1 with .
  • Students report , and perfection-level project standards.
  • Exams and and accommodations are hard to get.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Even students , and little path to improve, so an easy A is unrealistic.

Online reviews give more detail on project zeros and language policing; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Heavy reading, papers, and teaching rather than pure content brilliance.

Both formats call the work hard; online students stress unreadability of expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Some sections mark attendance mandatory and others not, with .

; online often does not.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

All quality scores are 1 and and .

Online and ; sample is small but unanimous.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Students describe unfair zeros, rigid guidelines, and F-level punishments over wording or perfect compliance.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the strongest harsh-grading examples; .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of reading, papers, tests, and a .

Format shift

Online mentions one big project carrying the grade; .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

, and no effective instruction or accommodation.

Format shift

Online students stress no email replies; in-person stresses no accommodation.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

and large projects with few small grade buffers.

Format shift

; in-person emphasizes difficult exams plus project.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Sparse in-person comments echo no accommodation and .

Main concern

No accommodation and projects graded as if examples were given when they were not.

What students said

“didnt accommodate me!”
GNDR100
“For the and told us to use the , but then graded it as if we were suppose to follow an example she didn't provide.”
GNDR100

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are uniformly negative about unfair , and exams that feel designed to fail.

Main concern

No help when stuck plus zero-tolerance project guidelines and .

What students said

“ . The instructor doesn't grade fairly, communication is poor, and you'll spend more time fighting for your grade than actually learning.”
GNDR100
“Everything had to be perfect or you would get a zero. ”
GNDR100
“ and when asked for help, has stated multiple times that she doesn't want us to ask for help.”
GNDR100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and as overly specific, poorly supported, and graded without helpful models or flexibility.

Test heavyWeirdly specific examsNo accommodationsHigh-stakes projectUnclear examples

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

covered, and the final project is graded against unprovided examples.

Exams beyond provided materialNo project examplesNo email replies
“ of the questions on it weren't even in the material she gave to the class.”
GNDR100
“Don't .”
GNDR100

Online

Online exams feel oddly specific beyond the textbook, accommodations are refused, and .

Weirdly specific examsNo test accommodationsZero on imperfect projectUnclear instructions
“Exams are weirdly specific and , like designed for class wide failure.”
GNDR100
“Everything had to be perfect or you would get a zero.”
GNDR100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . The instructor doesn't grade fairly, communication is poor, and you'll spend more time fighting for your grade than actually learning.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 uniformly negative GNDR100 reviews (5 online, 2 in person). Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Collapse

5/100

“Jessica Ayo Alibi is the so far at OCC!”

⚖️

8/100

“Everything had to be perfect or you would get a zero. ”

📧 Accessibility Failure

10/100

“Don't .”

🧪

22/100

“Exams are weirdly specific and , like designed for class wide failure.”

Theme 1

📉

  • doesn't grade fairly
  • She gave me an F on an assignment because I use the word Hispanic
  • Everything had to be perfect or you would get a zero

Theme 2

📧 About Communication

  • when asked for help, has stated multiple times that she doesn't want us to ask for help
  • Don't
  • communication is poor

Theme 3

📝 About Workload and Tests

  • The whole grade is
  • questions on it weren't even in the material she gave to the class
  • So many papers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 7 reviews, but every one is quality 1 with and access, so direction is clear despite small n.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

GNDR1007 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1