Avoid if you want an easy art GE; only consider her if you want strict professional standards and can handle heavy critique.
Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy Studio WorkloadHarsh CritiquesPolarizing ReviewsProfessional Art Push
—Recent reviews warn of harshgrading,extremeweeklydrawingload, and discouraging critiques.
—Older book arts and illustration students often praised professional standards and skill growth.
—Take-againrateisverylow; experience depends heavily on whether you want a demanding pro-track art class.
Key questions
Four answers before you build your schedule.
Is this an easy A?
HardWork
28/100
Tough-gradertags and reports of harsh marks for imperfect following of instructions make high grades effortful and uncertain.
Online beginner drawing is especially unforgiving; older in-person serious art students report As after heavy effort.
Is the course easy?
Challenging
32/100
Highweeklyproduction,reading/writinginartclasses, and professional-style client deadlines raise the challenge.
Online load is extreme for a beginner course; in-person book arts also rates hard when students fully engage.
Is attendance flexible?
Mandatory
34/100
Manyrecentsectionslistattendancemandatory; online often not mandatory but still enforces heavy weekly output.
Onlinereviewssayattendanceno; in-person studio classes more often require presence.
Is this professor recommended?
Avoid
28/100
Roughly one-in-six would take again, and recentcommentsrepeatedlysayavoidortakeanyoneelse.
Olderin-personillustration/bookartsfansrecommendher; current online and several recent in-person reviews do not.
Course guide
See how this professor fits your week.
Grading
Harsh
24/100
Toughgradertagsdominaterecentreviews; critiques and exact-instruction standards lower grades quickly.
Format shift
Online harsh grading is near-universal in recent comments; someolderin-personstudentsfeltfeedbackwasfair.
Workload
Heavy
22/100
Weekly multi-drawing sets, journals, supplies costs, and long studio meetings create a heavy load.
Format shift
Online warns of 9-12 hours weekly; in-personalsocitesweeklyhomework and long lecture blocks.
Teaching experience
Average
42/100
Skill-building and industry simulation earn praise historically, but recent students call teaching unfocused or unprofessional.
Format shift
Recentonline/in-personcritiquesareharsh; pre-2016 studio students often called her exceptional.
Assessment method
FocusOnAssignments
22/100
Portfolio projects, weekly drawings, journals, and professional-style assignments drive assessment rather than sit-down exams.
Format shift
Both formats center on project production; nocleartraditionalexamstructureisdescribed.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Compare the in-person and online experience.
Classroom format
In person
28 reviews
High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner
In-person history is split—older book arts/illustration praise skill growth, newerartsectionscriticizeunclearinstructions and harsh critique.
Main concern
Strict rules, long lectures, costly supplies, and feedbackthatmanycalldiscouraging.
What students said
“She just critiques your art instead of appreciating it, I don't think she is suited to be an art professor.”
“She pushes youtodoyourbest, but you learn so much from her.”
Remote format
Online
3 reviews
Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner
Recent online ART120 reviews are strongly negative: 8+ drawings weekly, harsh exacting grades, and warningstodrop.
Main concern
Huge weekly hours and toughgradingmakeonlinebeginnerartfeellikea trap for easy credit.
What students said
“In her class, you have to do 8+ drawings every week, and she expects you to spend numerous hours onthissupposed"easy"assignments”
“Donottakethisprofessor. She is the worstartteacherI'veeverhad.”
Exam style
Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.
Assessment is project and critique based with strict standards rather than proctored academic exams.
Weekly art projectsPortfolio style workStrict instruction followingCritique based grading
Assessment risk
Standard
55/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In person
In-personclassesusestudioprojects,journals, and critique rather than formal locked exams.
Studio projectsCritique sessionsProfessional-style assignments
“Hergradingiswaytoostrict and herinstructionsarenotclear.”
“Treats illustrators like factory workers not artists who deserve credit for following all her uptight rules.”
Online
Online reviews describe weekly art projects and harshprojectgrading,notwebcamexams.
Weekly drawingsHarsh project grading
“gives weekly art projects, way to much work for an online art class”
Student evidence
See what students actually said.
Top student voice
“Donottakethisprofessor. She is the worstartteacherI'veeverhad.”
⚠️ Recent Recommendation Risk
28/100
“Takeanyotheronlineartclass but hers.”
📝 Workload Intensity
22/100
“if you dont spend 9-12 hours a week on her class she will FAIL YOU”
⚖️ GradingStrictness
24/100
“I was graded harshly for not doing everything exact, yet people were turning in ai art.”
🎯 Historical Teaching Strength
70/100
“Kim is a great teacher. She pushes youtodoyourbest, but you learn so much from her.”
Theme 1
👨🏫 About Teaching Style
—sheisnice but she gives WAYYY too much work for a beginning drawing class
—She's focused on politics and conservation efforts with seriously ZERO attention for making art
—She goes the extra mile to help her students both in the class and in advancing their professional careers.
Theme 2
📈 About Difficulty & Grades
—Toughgrader
—Hergradingiswaytoostrict and herinstructionsarenotclear.
—This class is not some easy art credit class
Theme 3
🎨 About Studio Outcomes
—When i started her class, all i can draw were stick doodles but now I can draw building perspectives and more.
—The projectsmirrorprofessionaljobs
—You WILL grow from this class.
Data context
See exactly what the AI read.
Analysis sample
31
Recent reviews read by the AI
31
Lifetime ratings
84/100
Evidence confidence
31 reviews with a cleartemporalsplit: older strong positives versus recent strong negatives; sample size and detail support a medium-high confidence blended read.