AI Rate Professor

Orange Coast College · Electronics Technology

Robert Castano

ROBO101 · ELECTRONICS047 · ELECA047 · ELECTRONICTECH · ELECT047 · ELECT125 · ELECTRONICSTEC · ELEC246 · ELEC47 · ELECALL · ELECA260 · ELECTA150 · ELECA135 · ENGINEERING · ENGIN180 · ALLELECTRONICS · ELECT155 · A155 · ELEC101 · ELEC047 · ELEC135 · ELECA155 · TECHNOLOGY · ELEC155 · ELEC150 · IT117 · A047 · 52 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Only take him if you thrive on self-research and ; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedSelf-DirectedPolarizingIndustry StyleSubjective Grading
  • Many , and poorly structured as a lecturer.
  • A minority praise him as a passionate engineer who prepares self-starters for industry.
  • Grading and due dates often feel vague or subjective, frustrating average students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

A few call it an easy A with no structure, but most say projects, reports, and .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Content can feel advanced and self-directed with sparse scaffolding for beginners.

In-person only; polarized by prior electronics experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Tags and comments say skipping hurts, lectures can be irreplaceable, but policies vary by section.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

and industry prep; the other half call him the .

All reviews in person; split is consistent over years.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

few clear criteria and picky lab standards.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Portfolios, technical reports, rewritten notes, and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Frequent complaints of off-topic lectures, poor communication, and lateness outweigh praise from highly motivated students.

Format shift

In-person only; experiences diverge by student type.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Labs, tech reports, group projects, and portfolios dominate over traditional exams.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

many slam lateness, mood, and , while a few credit deep engineering passion and career growth.

Main concern

, and frustration when students ask questions.

What students said

“He would LITERALLY be late to class EVERY SINGLE DAY.”
ALLELECTRONICS
“This guy is directly responsible for helping me go from a technician to an engineer.”
A047
“ and unprofessional.”
ELEC101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews rarely detail formal exams; assessment centers on projects and reports with .

Project HeavyTechnical ReportsSubjective GradingGroup Projects

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and tech reports more than standard timed exams.

LabsTechnical ReportsPortfoliosGroup Projects
“Between the portfolios and the technical reports, and the lack of direction.”
A047
“ , and write tech reports.”
ELEC155

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easily the entire years of professional education”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, highlighting polarization between chaos and industry prep. Credibility rating: High.

⏰ Organization and Punctuality

25/100

“He would LITERALLY be late to class EVERY SINGLE DAY.”

🔧 Career Value for Self-Starters

70/100

“This guy is directly responsible for helping me go from a technician to an engineer.”

📉 Communication

30/100

“ and activities and gets angry when they are not completed.”

🎯 Fit Depends on You

48/100

“Totally depends on your way of learning, some people fit very well with him, others terribly”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Classroom time lacks structure.
  • goes off topic frequently and gets frustrated easily
  • One of the , and an excellent engineer.

Theme 2

📋 and Work

  • Your grade is what he decides to give you.
  • He expects a lot out of you, but he also prepares you for the industry.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Fit

  • his classes are not for idiots looking for extra credits
  • .
  • if your extremely interested in that major he will definately get you on your way

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

52

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

50 in-person reviews over many years show a stable polarizing pattern with detailed behavioral examples.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 56
2 out of 511
1 out of 524

Course coverage

ELEC0475 reviews
ELEC1015 reviews
ELEC475 reviews
ELEC1504 reviews
ELEC1353 reviews
Show 22 more courses
ELEC1553 reviews
ELECA0473 reviews
A0472 reviews
ALLELECTRONICS2 reviews
A1551 review
ELEC2461 review
ELECA1351 review
ELECA1551 review
ELECA2601 review
ELECALL1 review
ELECT0471 review
ELECT1251 review
ELECT1551 review
ELECTA1501 review
ELECTRONICS0471 review
ELECTRONICSTEC1 review
ELECTRONICTECH1 review
ENGIN1801 review
ENGINEERING1 review
IT1171 review
ROBO1011 review
TECHNOLOGY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1