AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Rebecca Sims

PSYC260 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid her online PSYC sections unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderPoor CommunicationLate GradesUnclear ExpectationsPolarizing Online
  • Online students repeatedly report ignored emails and .
  • and strict, with hidden Cengage work and .
  • In-person reviews are fewer and more mixed, including one strong positive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Even when content is not brutal, strict grading and .

and incomplete grades; one in-person student still earned an A+.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Material itself can feel manageable, but , and .

Online students call the class easy but poorly run; and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Several online reviews say attendance is not required, while .

Online evidence leans optional; in-person evidence is mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most reviewers warn others off due to communication failures and harsh or .

Recommendation is much worse online; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

, and students say and vague written work can sink the grade.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Weekly quizzes, discussions, papers, and group work add up without always feeling intellectually deep.

Format shift

Online mentions hidden Cengage assignments and discussions; in person mentions weekly chapter quizzes and movie work.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Repeated reports of ignored messages, rude clarification, and late grades overshadow the few positive notes.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is near floor; in-person sample is tiny and more favorable.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Quizzes, discussions, research paper work, group tasks, and a .

Format shift

In person highlights a 100-question final; online stresses quizzes, papers, and discussions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

one student found lectures and tests easy and and finals heavy.

Main concern

Even in and a .

What students said

“I love Dr. Sims! I had an A+ in her class all semester”
PSYC260
“You fail if you dont submit the movie work. No make-ups. 100 question final.”
PSYC260

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online experience is dominated by non-response, vague prompts, late grades, and tough scoring.

Main concern

Students feel abandoned when seeking clarification and .

What students said

“ . . Problems with communication.”
PSYC260
“DONT. You've been warned.”
PSYC260
“Easy class, BAD teacher.”
PSYC260

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is conventional quiz and call unclear.

Weekly Quizzes100 Question FinalWritten AnalysisCengage Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a 100-question final with no make-ups for key work.

Weekly Chapter Quiz100 Question FinalNo Make-ups
“ after you read a chapter in the textbook at home.”
PSYC260
“100 question final.”
PSYC260

Online

Online reviews ; they do report quizzes that are not always multiple choice and heavy written analysis.

Not Always Multiple ChoiceResearch PaperDiscussion Points
“ as she claims them to be.”
PSYC260
“ ."”
PSYC260

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . AND email).”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, weighted toward repeated online communication failures; credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Experience

22/100

“This teacher is the worst!!!! and takes forever to get a hold of!”

⚖️

18/100

“ . Problems with communication. ”

👎 Recommendation

24/100

“DONT. You've been warned.”

📬 Communication Gap

15/100

“left me on read MULTIPLE TIMES”

Theme 1

📬 About Communication

  • .
  • AND email).
  • when asked for clarification she just repeats herself.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Clarity

  • Grades are late. .
  • Nothing was graded until 11/24.
  • you .

Theme 3

🧭

  • I love Dr. Sims! I had an A+ in her class all semester
  • lectures she practically skips through her slides had a hard time keeping up

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only seven reviews exist, but the five online ones are highly consistent about communication and .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

PSYC2607 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 2