AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Renata Cioczek-Georges

MATH170 · MATH160 · MATHA185 · MATH120 · MATH180 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
17.65%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless you already master algebra/trig and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCondescending lecturesFast pace no notesHarsh attendance cold-callsTest-heavy grindHigh drop rate
  • Most students report condescending tone, messy notes, and lectures too fast to follow.
  • and wrong answers counted as absence.
  • Tests and ; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

, and unless you already know the material cold.

Both online and and high failure risk.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

14/100

, and weak explanations force hours of self-study after class.

Online and and missing support materials.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

and wrong cold-call answers can erase the .

Both .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

The dominant student message is do not take her for your sanity or GPA.

A few recent positives exist, but the large majority across formats urge avoidance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

Tough grader tags, no curves, and .

Format shift

and in-person comments.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of , and test-heavy load after class.

Format shift

and in person.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students cite rambling, illegible writing, condescension, and .

Format shift

A couple recent in-person 5s exist, but most reviews across formats are 1s.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tests and huge reviews drive the .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person math is widely called demeaning, illegible, and .

Main concern

Wrong answers mark you absent and lectures move on without notes.

What students said

If she calls on you and your answer is wrong... she marks you absent.
Math160
Avg for each test has been 45-55% & refuses to curve grades.
MATH180
A little over half the class dropped this class.
MATH170

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and cheating accusations.

Main concern

Cannot rewatch sessions and .

What students said

refuses to upload past zoom sessions so you cant rewatch lectures
Math160
Sometimes I feel like she didn't even know what she was doing.
MATH120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and students say reviews are enormous while lectures leave gaps.

Test heavyNo curveHuge review packets

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and messy unshared notes.

Test heavyNo curveNo lecture notes uploaded
Avg for each test has been 45-55% & refuses to curve grades.
MATH180
Doesn't upload lecture notes so it's very hard to keep up
MATH170

Online

Reviews emphasize speed, attendance penalties, and constant .

Fast lecturesAttendance cold-callsCheating accusations
Accuses students of cheating CONSTANTLY. More than half dropped/failed
Math160

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

! The if you enjoy being disrespected or belittled in front of the class.

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews (2 online, 15 in person), highlighting harsh climate and test pressure. Credibility rating: High.

🚨 Teaching Quality

15/100

This professor is extremely condescending, and is quite frankly terrible at teaching.

📉 Recommendation Rate

16/100

Please, for .

⚖️

16/100

Avg for each test has been 45-55% & refuses to curve grades.

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Moves fast. Doesn't upload lecture notes
  • illegible writing
  • You have to teach yourself EVERYTHING through the homework

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A little over half the class dropped this class
  • only three or so passed the class

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • Makes fun of her students
  • marks you absent if you answer wrong
  • told some students they should not be in college

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

17 reviews with strong negative consistency across years, .

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 514

Course coverage

Math1606 reviews
MATH1705 reviews
MATH1203 reviews
MATH1802 reviews
MATHA1851 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 3 · A- 2

B range

3

B 3

C range

3

C 1 · C- 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 1