AI Rate Professor

Art

Joel Woodard

ART101 · ART105 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

online may work if you need structure, but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHarsh art critiqueUnclear online deadlinesMixed format qualityClear criteria onlineDiscouraging feedback
  • and unhelpful.
  • and confusing quizzes/deadlines.
  • Sample size is tiny, so outcomes swing hard by format and term.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Students still report A- or B+, but harsh critique and and stressful.

; online is mixed on clarity and fairness.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty is moderate, but and .

Both formats describe mid-level difficulty with process friction.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

participation emphasized.

Both online and as mandatory when stated.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Three of four reviews discourage taking him, especially for drawing-focused students.

Online has one strong yes and one no; in-person is fully negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

and demoralizing critique outweigh the .

Format shift

In-person feels harsher; one older online review found criteria fair.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Weekly work and but not described as overwhelming by all.

Format shift

; online stresses keeping up weekly.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Helpfulness ranges from inspiring online .

Format shift

Online reviews conflict; in-person reviews are strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grades rest on drawings, weekly assignments, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and quizzes over big exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person drawing reviews are and unhelpful critique.

Main concern

.

What students said

“I took his Chaffey College Intro to Drawing class and boy oh boy did it make me lose all my passion for art.”
ART101
“Horribly unhelpful”
ART101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One student found clear criteria and fast help; and video-trivia quizzes.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“He gives clear description of the requirements for each assignment and has a .”
ART101
“There will be assignments where the if not turned in on time.”
ART105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; online quizzes and studio projects dominate.

Assignment-basedVideo-specific quizzes onlineStudio critique

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not describe formal exams; assessment is drawing critique and participation.

Studio drawing critiqueParticipation matters
“He would grade my drawings worse than the kids who would show up with their drawing ripped in half.”
ART101

Online

Online work uses assignment deadlines plus quizzes tied tightly to video details.

Video-specific quizzesUnclear due datesWeekly assignments
“There will be quizzes with questions incredibly specific to the video itself”
ART105

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you like to draw and have a hard time taking in a lot of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (2 online, 2 in person) with low sample confidence. Credibility rating: Low.

🎨

30/100

“boy oh boy did it make me lose all my passion for art.”

👍 Online Helpfulness

70/100

“Professor Woodard will help you whenever you need any help, , and notes to enhance your work.”

😕 Online Confusion

25/100

“His class is one of the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Horribly unhelpful
  • Always available and
  • Save yourself the headache and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

Theme 3

🎯

  • a lot of
  • notes to enhance your work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 reviews split evenly by format with conflicting tone, so confidence stays low.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART1013 reviews
ART1051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A- 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values