Is this an easy A?
HardWork
34/100Some students still earn As, but because lectures and .
Nearly ; online sample is too small and split.
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Some students still earn As, but only through heavy self-study because lectures and exams often feel misaligned.
Nearly all grade-effort evidence is in-person; online sample is too small and split.
Is the course easy?
Gen chem already hard, and students say he makes simple topics more complicated while exams stay high stakes.
In-person comments dominate this judgment.
Is attendance flexible?
Many sections take attendance seriously even when students feel lectures do not help them on tests.
In-person attendance is often mandatory; online also reported attendance required in both reviews.
Is this professor recommended?
Only about one-third would take him again, and many explicitly say avoid because lectures do not prepare you for exams.
In-person sentiment is mostly avoid; the two online reviews disagree with each other.
Course guide
Grading
Strict
38/100
Tests and lab quizzes are frequently called hard, and several students tag him as a tough grader despite occasional end-of-term curves.
Format shift
Strictness is clearest in recent in-person CHEM180 and CHEM100 comments.
Workload
Heavy
28/100
Students report weekly homework, lots of self-study hours, frequent quizzes, and exam-heavy grading.
Format shift
Both formats mention heavy assessment load; in-person self-study burden is the recurring theme.
Teaching experience
Poor
34/100
A few students find him caring and funny, but the dominant view is that lectures overcomplicate material and fail to prepare for tests.
Format shift
Lab persona is often better than lecture quality in in-person reviews.
Assessment method
FocusOnExams
78/100
Grades lean on quizzes and a small number of high-weight exams, with homework often for practice rather than credit.
Format shift
In-person and the harsher online review both describe exam-and-quiz centered grading.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
In-person CHEM100 and CHEM180 reviews repeatedly criticize lecture-test mismatch and demand efficient self-study, with better feedback about lab help.
Main concern
Lectures often feel useless for exams, so the class becomes a grind of homework, quizzes, and self-teaching.
What students said
“his lectures don't cover ANYTHING that might be on a test.”
“Avoid James Ross at all costs. His notes and lectures do not correlate with the 3 exams worth 50% of your grade.”
“Self-study ALOT/HRS is key, hes a terrible lecturer.”
Remote format
Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
The two online reviews split between one strong teaching experience and one overloaded quiz-and-exam nightmare.
Main concern
One online section piled on many quizzes, exams, homework sources, and a writing assignment with no makeup options.
What students said
“Chemistry wasn't my strongest subject in high school however he was able to explain the material thoroughly.”
“We literally had 10 more small quizzes and 5 large quizzes. also 5 Exams which worth 50% percent of total grades.”
Exam style
Exams and quizzes drive the grade and often feel harder or less connected to lecture than students expect.
Assessment risk
Strict
36/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person students say tests can be doable with self-study and outlines, but lectures often do not match quizzes or exams and lab quizzes are harsh.
“Exam Outlines correlate very well to tested material so its easy to study for, but watch out for the lab quizzes. They're notoriously hard to pass!”
“His quizzes and exams were rarely related to the study guides he gave us.”
“Derived a bunch of random ass equations that had no correlation to the test.”
One online review describes a heavy stack of small quizzes, large quizzes, and five exams worth half the grade with no makeups.
“We literally had 10 more small quizzes and 5 large quizzes. also 5 Exams which worth 50% percent of total grades.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“his lectures don't cover ANYTHING that might be on a test. Way too detailed for Gen chem A but gives you all material needed to do well on tests. Will need sufficient self studying”
“Terrible lecturer, overcomplicates concepts and rarely goes over examples step by step.”
“Take if you're able to self-study EFFICIENTLY.”
“Avoid James Ross at all costs.”
“in lab he's very helpful and friendly, and I enjoyed getting to know him.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Theme 4
Data context
Analysis sample
20
Recent reviews read by the AI
20
Lifetime ratings
72/100
Evidence confidence
Twenty mostly detailed recent reviews form a consistent negative lecture-exam pattern, though a minority of positive outliers remain.
Inside 20 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
20 reported outcomes
A 6 · A- 2
B 1
C 2 · C- 1
No reported values
No reported values
Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5