AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Aisha Bourouis-Benyassine

MATH170 · MATH105 · MATH115 · MATHA170 · A120 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if ; most students should find another professor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLots of homeworkLecture heavyTough graderFast pacedSelf teach required
  • Many students say lectures copy the textbook too quickly with .
  • Homework and written tests are much harder than class examples, with almost no partial credit.
  • A minority succeed by grinding MyMathLab and office hours, but and harsh grades are common.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A and self-study, while many report Ds, incompletes, or drops.

Online reviews are softer; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and little in-class support make precalculus and algebra feel very tough.

In-person difficulty comments are far harsher than the two online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and some students say two absences can get you dropped.

Both formats stress showing up; online notes that skip class and you will not pass.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

33/100

Only and most in-person comments urge finding another math professor.

Online reviews are more positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

, and tests harder than lectures dominate student reports.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Weekly 30-plus question homework, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Both formats report lots of homework; online uses MyMathLab heavily.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Many say she copies the book, moves too fast, and leaves students to self-teach.

Format shift

Online reviews rate teaching clearer; in-person reviews are mostly poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

74/100

Written tests, weekly quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online uses MyMathLab quizzes and tests; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews dominate and , and high drop rates.

Main concern

Lecture-to-test gap and .

What students said

“A large portion of our class ended up dropping the course.”
A120
“class started with 35 ended with 3.”
MATH115
“ !”
MATH170

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Two online MATH170 reviews are milder and if you attend and study.

Main concern

and required participation still make the course work-intensive.

What students said

“ , but I can see why she isn't for everyone.”
MATH170
“All the assignments, quizzes, and . .”
MATH170

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are written, show-all-work, and often harder than lecture examples, with limited study-key support.

Written testsNo multiple choiceHarder than homeworkCumulative finalMyMathLab quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and problems harder than lecture practice.

Written testsShow all workNo study guide answer keysHarder test problems
“there are no study guides for the test and gives NO multiple choice it's all written and you have to show all work!”
MATH170
“when I asked for an , she laughed and told me that she didn't have time to make one for us.”
MATH170

Online

Online MATH170 uses MyMathLab for assignments, quizzes, and tests with required participation.

MyMathLab testsParticipation required
“All the assignments, quizzes, and .”
MATH170
“She used mymathlab for pretty much everything”
MATH170

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“class started with 35 ended with 3. The numbers speak for themselves here. !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews (2 online, 20 in person), highlighting self-teaching pressure and harsh exams. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

32/100

“all she does is write the textbook context word for word on the whiteboard as a lecture.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

33/100

“ ”

⚖️

22/100

“there is almost no partial credit.”

📚

30/100

“basically making you rely on the text book to teach you mostly everything.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She lectures word for word off of the text book
  • felt more like copying notes than learning math.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very fast-paced class with .
  • the lecture is easy but the .
  • She chooses the toughest problems for her tests.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Weekly quizzes and homework with 30+ questions.
  • She gives loads of .
  • there is a lot of HW but that's how I got A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

22 reviews from 2014-2026 with , and harsh testing despite a few positive outliers.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH17011 reviews
MATH1154 reviews
MATHA1704 reviews
A1202 reviews
MATH1051 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

3

D+ 2 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 2