AI Rate Professor

English

Ingy Mohamed

Courses not reported · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you will read and write a lot; skip if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardGet ready to readTough graderLecture heavyPaper heavyCaring but uneven
  • Sweet and accessible for students who put in work, but .
  • , and .
  • and participation carries real weight.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As are possible with effort, but and heavy workload make an A costly.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

and writing, but volume of articles, annotation, and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and participation often counts like essays.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

and many warn about teaching style despite a few strong fans.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Tough grader tags and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of reading, annotation, papers, and timed in-class writing pile up quickly.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

some call her caring and and assume prior knowledge.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grade and short writings, not exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

reading, papers, and lectures many find boring or assume prior knowledge.

Main concern

and mandatory participation.

What students said

“She's one of the . If you care, she cares.”
20537
“nice lady but . doesn't have a good teaching style. grades super late as well. :(”
20537
“bad teaching style, as other students leaving reviews are saying her teaching style is horrible. she expects you to already know everything.”
40057

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and in-class writing more than traditional proctored exams.

Paper-focused assessmentIn-class short writingParticipation weighted

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation rather than described closed-book finals.

Major papersIn-class paragraph assignmentsParticipation points
“a ton of your grade is based off of 4 papers that take up 4 classes”
20537
“Lots of and she frequently hands out short timed paragraph assignments towards the end of class.”
20537

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's one of the . If you care, she cares.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“bad teaching style, as other students leaving reviews are saying her teaching style is horrible. she expects you to already know everything.”

📚 Workload Intensity

28/100

“There are a ton of assignments and papers. Be prepared.”

⚖️

32/100

“nice lady but . doesn't have a good teaching style.”

👍 Recommendation Split

38/100

“I really liked her all these bad reviews are making me sad :(. She is a good teacher and a sweet lady”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • expects you to already know everything
  • in-class lectures are so boring
  • and office hours

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Be ready to read and annotate a lot tho
  • a ton of your grade is based off of 4 papers

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is a good teacher and a sweet lady
  • She's super sweet
  • The professor is a sweet lady but her teaching style is not good

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

and tag detail, but opinions are polarized and sample is modest.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

205375 reviews
400573 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values