AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Joseph Ninh

MATHA120 · A030 · MATH185 · MATH160MATH096 · MATH010 · MATH170 · A180 · CALCA185 · MATHA160 · MATH30 · MATHA185 · MATH180 · MATH10 · MATHA180 · MATH140 · MATH130 · MATHA010 · 62 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
46.67%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take him if you will attend every lecture and ; skip if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTest heavyLecture heavyLots of homeworkCurves gradesStraight-forward examples
  • Lecture and examples if you attend
  • and unhelpful for others
  • and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A is possible with perfect attendance and , but , and many report B to D outcomes.

Online reviews also stress work volume; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Fast lectures, dense homework, and high.

; some online lower-level reports feel more manageable.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Many reviews mark attendance mandatory and stress that .

; in-person is especially lecture-critical.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

; the other half warn of and poor support.

Online is mixed; in-person has large positive and negative camps.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

, and limited ; curves exist but often small.

Format shift

; one online review notes no grade rounding.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of ; some online students report 70-plus homework hours.

Format shift

; online MyLab work can be especially time-consuming.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

, while others find him robotic, impatient, or .

Format shift

Teaching quality splits in both formats; in-person volume shows both excellent and awful extremes.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tests and ; few categories and graded-by-few-things tags are common.

Format shift

; online also .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person calc and stats students say and notes if you never miss class, but many find him fast, strict, and low on support.

Main concern

Limited office hours, fast pace, and .

What students said

“Make sure you show up to lectures because he basically just goes over practice problems which he just switches the numbers for the exam”
MATH185
“Don't miss lectures; the way he solves the problems is exactly how you should solve them on the exam.”
MATHA180
“He's good at Math not at teaching Stats160.”
MATH170

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and one harsh unhelpful report.

Main concern

One online review calls him hostile and unwilling to round borderline grades.

What students said

“He was a chill teacher, very patient and understanding.”
MATH160MATH096
“He is super unreasonable, .”
MATH010
“If you can thoroughly follow directions and put in enough work you will earn a good grade.”
MATHA160

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and are fair if you master lecture examples, but often hard with limited support.

Test heavyExams mirror homeworkGenerous or modest curveFew graded categoriesNo office hours often

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams closely track class problems and , but many call them hard and unforgiving.

Test heavyHomework-based examsCurveLecture critical
“he basically just goes over practice problems which he just switches the numbers for the exam”
MATH185
“ and his practice problems”
MATH180
“ .”
MATHA120

Online

Online reviews mention lecture-like exam questions and ; .

Exam-similar examplesMyLab homeworkHeavy practice
“His examples from the lectures were .”
MATHA160
“I ended up spending 70 plus hours on homework alone, w/o studying and lectures.”
MATHA160

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Make sure you show up to lectures because he basically just goes over practice problems which he just switches the numbers for the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews including 3 online and 47 in-person math courses, emphasizing exam alignment versus support gaps. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity Split

55/100

“He's a good teacher. No office hours, but he would stay after class to help students!”

📝

70/100

“ and his practice problems”

⚠️ Support Concerns

30/100

“No office hours and barely answers emails.”

👍 Recommendation Depends

47/100

“ if you must.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are straightforward and to the point
  • he teaches very quickly
  • He's like a robot

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but I was not locked in to actually get an A
  • He is really a . Don't expect any from him.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • I ended up spending 70 plus hours on homework alone

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

62

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years and courses with , and attendance give strong confidence.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 514
3 out of 510
2 out of 57
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH17011 reviews
MATH1806 reviews
MATHA1805 reviews
MATH1854 reviews
MATH304 reviews
Show 12 more courses
MATHA1204 reviews
MATH0103 reviews
MATH103 reviews
MATHA1852 reviews
A0301 review
A1801 review
CALCA1851 review
MATH1301 review
MATH1401 review
MATH160MATH0961 review
MATHA0101 review
MATHA1601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

13

A 12 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

3

C+ 1 · C- 2

D range

3

D+ 1 · D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1