Is this an easy A?
EasyA
78/100Many A and A+ reports with comments that it is still an easy A despite weak teaching.
Both formats report high grades; online has more Easy A and tags.
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Many A and A+ reports with comments that it is still an easy A despite weak teaching.
Both formats report high grades; online has more Easy A and Extra Credit tags.
Is the course easy?
Content is not deeply hard, but tests still need study and lectures often fail to teach it.
Online difficulty ratings swing more; in-person stress easy A with weak stimulation.
Is attendance flexible?
Some sections mark attendance mandatory, others optional; skip-class tags appear in places.
Online and in-person both mix mandatory and non-mandatory flags.
Is this professor recommended?
Take-again rate is low and recent voices push choose someone else despite older praise.
Recent online reviews are harsher; older online and one in-person review are warmer.
Course guide
Grading
Lenient
72/100
Students note fair grading, extra credit, and high grades even when teaching is weak.
Format shift
Leniency appears in both formats; online also tags Extra Credit often.
Workload
Moderate
55/100
Weekly posts, quizzes, papers, and test prep create steady work without being crushing.
Format shift
Online details weekly discussions and quizzes; in-person stresses tests and papers.
Teaching experience
Poor
34/100
Frequent claims of narcissism, boredom, tangents, and ineffective notes outweigh caring praise.
Format shift
Online recent reviews are most negative; in-person is mixed but still weak on clarity.
Assessment method
Balanced
55/100
Mix of weekly quizzes or discussions, papers, midterm, and final rather than one extreme.
Format shift
Online describes weekly posts and quizzes; in-person is more test heavy.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter
In-person classes can feel vague and unorganized yet still yield easy A grades with study and papers.
Main concern
Unclear lectures force heavy self-study despite easy grades.
What students said
“Ken Tangen gives vague lectures and is disorganized.”
“He's a nice guy, but honestly not a good teacher.”
“You will have to study a lot for the exams.”
Remote format
Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
Online experiences range from caring fair grading to harsh claims he talks about himself and wastes time.
Main concern
Personality and low teaching value in recent online sections.
What students said
“Just talks about himself the entire time which has no actual value.”
“Easy but class is BORING. He literally just goes over pointers and isn’t really teaching.”
“Professor Tangen is a very caring Psychology teacher that tries to make all of his discussions and papers very interesting.”
Exam style
Tests and quizzes matter; reviews do not clearly prove webcam proctoring or open-book rules.
Assessment risk
Standard
50/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person comments call the class test heavy with required study but do not detail proctoring tools.
“The class is test heavy but not unfairly so.”
“You will have to study a lot for the exams.”
Online reviews mention oddly worded tests, study pointers, mini quizzes, and midterm plus final without clear proctoring claims.
“Preparing for test he tells you what to remember so if you study those you will be good.”
“Each week there is a discussion post, a written assignment and a mini quiz. There also is a midterm and final.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“Easy but class is BORING. He literally just goes over pointers and isn’t really teaching.”
“Just talks about himself the entire time which has no actual value.”
“Still, it's an easy A class I guess.”
“Choose someone else. Complete waste.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
9
Recent reviews read by the AI
9
Lifetime ratings
58/100
Evidence confidence
Nine reviews across online and in-person from 2015-2024 give clear themes but a modest sample with polarized tone.
Inside 9 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
9 reported outcomes
A+ 2 · A 3 · A- 1
B 2
No reported values
No reported values
F 1
No reported values