AI Rate Professor

Design

Renee Kubiak

INTERNSHIP · ID100 · INTERIORD · ID100L · ID105 · STUDIOCAREERS · STUDIO1 · IDA100 · IDSTUDIO1 · ID1 · ID240 · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
63.64%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want serious design training and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardAttendance sticklerExtra credit lifelineProject-heavy studioDetail-oriented graderPassionate about design
  • She is widely seen as knowledgeable and passionate about interior design with .
  • and .
  • and clear criteria help motivated students earn strong grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many report easy As if work is clean and complete, but tough detail standards and .

The one online review is easy and clear; journal grading.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Concepts are introductory for many, yet multi-hour studios, journals, and .

Online ID100 felt easy; in-person studio and portfolio work is substantially heavier.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Repeated tags and comments say skip class and you will not pass, with docks for lateness or leaving early.

; as not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Most students recommend her for real design training despite boredom, rambling, or workload gripes.

In-person opinions dominate and lean positive overall; online is limited but favorable.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

and , but detail pickiness and some tough journal grades pull scores down.

Format shift

Online feedback is positive on clarity; .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of homework, long projects, and portfolio prep make the .

Format shift

Online seems lighter; in-person studios and journals are repeatedly called heavy.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Many call her organized, passionate, and helpful, while and excessive personal stories.

Format shift

In-person is the full picture; one online review is simply positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Projects, journals, and and occasional tests also mentioned.

Format shift

Online highlights projects; and lecture checks.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and high standards with complaints about rambling lectures, busywork journals, and heavy projects.

Main concern

and time-consuming projects can overwhelm students who need flexibility.

What students said

“ .”
ID105
“Very and if you leave early and/or arrive .”
ID100
“ , and .”
IDSTUDIO1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online and easy content if you avoid procrastination.

Main concern

Only one online review limits how much can be generalized.

What students said

“ and the , so as long as you don't procrastinate them it is super doable.”
ID100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and straightforward tests appear alongside major project deliverables rather than harsh proctored finals.

Short timed quizzesEasy tests if preparedProject presentationsJournal grading

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and large graded projects or journals.

10 question quizzesEasy testsBig projectsNotebook journal
“She has 10 question 10 minute quizzes and they are pretty difficult.”
ID100
“And the . I didn't have to study much and I got an A.”
ID100
“The Notebook required is busy work, a lot of cutting and pasting”
ID100

Online

The and easy content without detailing exam security.

Project-focusedClear criteria
“the , so as long as you don't procrastinate them it is super doable.”
ID100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she is the best professor at occ she is really easy and so well and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews, emphasizing attendance rules and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“She is an excellent teacher! She really pushes and and available.”

📅

18/100

“stickler for but you learn a lot.”

📦 Workload Reality

35/100

“ not difficult but long.”

🎁 Path

72/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She teaches like elementary
  • Lectures can be very heavy and get a little boring at times
  • she has real passion for design

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just show up do the work and you will get an A
  • its an easy A for sure
  • She grades VERY hard

Theme 3

🧱

  • Be prepared for
  • gives you lots of projects
  • this class has a TON of work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

38 reviews over many years , and design passion.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 59
3 out of 56
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ID10015 reviews
ID10511 reviews
IDA1003 reviews
IDSTUDIO12 reviews
ID11 review
Show 6 more courses
ID100L1 review
ID2401 review
INTERIORD1 review
INTERNSHIP1 review
STUDIO11 review
STUDIOCAREERS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1