AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lan Pham

MATH185 · MATH170 · MATH4A · MTH180 · MATH30 · MATHA100 · MATH120 · CALC180 · MATH0 · MATH180 · TRIG120 · STATISTICS · MATHA180 · MATH3AH · MATHSECT · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are a strong self-starter and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard testsLots of homeworkTough graderConfusing answersHigh drop risk
  • Most students describe hard, long exams and .
  • Teaching clarity is frequently criticized, with many saying .
  • A minority praise patience, office hours, and curves if you grind the work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even strong students say high grades require grinding homework and .

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Comments repeatedly call tests super hard and long, with high difficulty ratings across calculus-level courses.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is not always formally mandatory, but and behind.

All comments are in-person; as not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students explicitly warn against taking him due to teaching style and extreme difficulty.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

Students call him a and harsh on homework.

Format shift

In-person only; a .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Tons of , and .

Format shift

All workload comments come from in-person classes.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Many say he cannot teach clearly, answers poorly, and .

Format shift

No online comparison available.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tests and exam success.

Format shift

In-person calculus and algebra sections are consistently test-centered.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All reviews are in person and largely warn that , and in lecture.

Main concern

Difficult long exams plus weak Q&A support .

What students said

“I learned betteer when I skipped and taught myself.”
MATH4A
“ .”
MATH185
“It isn't an easy A(many hw, not easy tests compared to others, no ) but I got a high grade”
MATH3AH

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are repeatedly described as long, difficult, and central to the course with .

Long hard examsWeekly quizzesTest heavyLimited partial creditHomework-aligned quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

from homework, and harsh grading with little cushion.

Long examsWeekly quizzesTest heavyHarsh partial credit
“the and long.”
MATH180
“Lots of homework. Weekly quizzes. Difficult tests. Very reluctant to give partial credit.”
MATH185
“Grades harsh on HW. .”
CALC180

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 and teaching clarity. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“this guy cant teach. hes alright but when i ask him about something he says "your supposed to know this already"”

📉 Recommendation

30/100

“ !”

📝

20/100

“the and long.”

❤️ Rare Positive Help

70/100

“he will always be here during his office hours!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I learned betteer when I skipped and taught myself
  • He mainly teaches right out from the book
  • He refused to answer questions and finish problems

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It isn't an easy A(many hw, not easy tests compared to others, no )
  • Difficult tests. Very reluctant to give partial credit
  • had like 40 ppl in the beg of class and 9 PPL @ THE END

Theme 3

📚

  • Tons of
  • Lots of homework
  • the same section

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

25 in-person reviews across many , and weak lecture support.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 57
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH1857 reviews
MATH1804 reviews
MATH302 reviews
CALC1801 review
MATH01 review
Show 10 more courses
MATH1201 review
MATH1701 review
MATH3AH1 review
MATH4A1 review
MATHA1001 review
MATHA1801 review
MATHSECT1 review
MTH1801 review
STATISTICS1 review
TRIG1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values