AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Moises Plascencia

ANTH175 · A105 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

; only consider in person if you accept high uncertainty from few reviews.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFormat-dependentUnresponsive onlinePaper-heavyRetaliation concernsEngaging in person
  • Online reviews and responsiveness
  • and the
  • Overall sample is tiny and split by course format

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

One student earned an A+ yet still , and others report heavy papers and tough difficulty.

Online evidence is negative on fairness; the .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Online students describe the class as extra hard with .

Online difficulty ratings are high; the .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

70/100

; other comments do not stress strict attendance.

saying no.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Two of three reviews strongly warn against him, especially .

; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Reports of , and retaliatory grade cuts dominate the online record.

Format shift

Harshness claims are online-only; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Tags and comments emphasize many papers and a workload that feels unnecessary for the course.

Format shift

Heavy-paper complaint is online; in-person did not detail workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Online students describe unresponsiveness and weak subject command, while .

Format shift

poor online, excellent in one in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Papers, group projects, and model.

Format shift

Online mentions papers and flawed quizzes; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single in-person review praises engaging lectures, humor, and .

Main concern

, so confidence is low.

What students said

“First prof I ever took at OCC and by far the . He really tries to engage everyone and joke around.”
A105

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students call the class excessive, poorly graded, and poorly supported, with one reporting grade retaliation after complaints.

Main concern

Unresponsive communication and .

What students said

“This is not one of them, find a different class this class is so extra for ”
A105
“Dropped w A+ because he was unresponsive to emails for 2 weeks at a time, graded incorrectly - made up different rules when he graded than in .”
ANTH175

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and conflicting, with quiz accuracy issues online and little detail in person.

Quizzes with contested answersPaper-heavyGroup projects

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

proctoring.

Online

Online comments mention quizzes with wrong answers and heavy paper requirements; .

Flawed quizzesMany papersGroup projects
“Cannot spell, quiz questions had blatantly wrong answers, doesn't know basic biology terms.”
ANTH175

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“find a different class this class is so extra for ”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews with strong format split. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Online Red Flags

15/100

“graded incorrectly - made up different rules when he graded than in ”

👍 In-Person Energy

90/100

“First prof I ever took at OCC and by far the .”

📚 Workload Pain

28/100

“This is not one of them, find a different class this class is so extra for ”

Theme 1

🖥️ About Online Experience

  • he was unresponsive to emails for 2 weeks at a time
  • When brought to his and his superiors attn he retaliated by slashing grades w no errors.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫

  • He really tries to engage everyone and joke around.
  • We talked about random things sometimes, but definitely learned a lot!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews with .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

A1052 reviews
ANTH1751 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values