AI Rate Professor

English

Jacqueline Johnson

ENG001 · ENGL100 · ENG100 · A004N · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you communicate early and want writing support, but expect homework and uneven experiences in at least one term.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyGood FeedbackCaring SupportGroup ProjectsHomework HeavyMixed Consistency
  • Most students praise caring support, grammar help, and .
  • , and substantial writing.
  • One strong negative review alleges ignored help requests and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Several students earn As with homework and , but one report of As are not guaranteed.

Online grades skew high for most reviewers; the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

helpful skill focus, but and group work add load.

Online short courses can feel dense; the .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

, and one tag warns that skipping hurts.

Both online and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Most reviewers would take her again for care and .

Online is mostly positive with one extreme negative; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Feedback is often praised as improving writing, but one .

Format shift

; the strictest grading complaint is online ENG100.

Workload

Moderate

44/100

, and group projects appear regularly; short online terms can feel packed.

Format shift

Online mentions lots of homework and group projects; in-person highlights group activities.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

, and confidence-building, though one review claims lectures wander and help never arrives.

Format shift

Online support stories are strong; in-person emphasizes adaptive facilitation.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and group projects dominate; one tag says test heavy, but .

Format shift

Online lists essays and homework; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One in-person ENGL100 review calls her adaptive, group-activity focused, and one of the .

Main concern

Single-sample only; lots of group activities may not suit solo learners.

What students said

“Hands down one of the . Adapts the class to the students and isn't afraid to change direction in order to facilitate more participation.”
ENGL100

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews mostly praise skill-building, resources, and feedback, with one scathing ENG100 report of and .

Main concern

A minority experience reports heavy group work, poor communication, and .

What students said

“She found so many resources for me to use a student with ADHD and a DSPS student.”
ENG001
“Absolutely terrible! if you want to pass this class. Tons of works and group projects. Never help her students”
ENG100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Most comments describe essays and projects; reviews do not clearly prove proctoring tools, and .

Essay FocusedGroup ProjectsHomework HeavyTest Heavy Tag

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence emphasizes group activities and .

Group ActivitiesParticipation Focused
“Lots of group activities that allow the students to learn about each other.”
ENGL100

Online

, and group projects; one review tags test heavy, but proctoring details are not proven.

EssaysGroup ProjectsLots of Homework
“we wrote one essay and a couple of the .”
A004N
“Tons of works and group projects.”
ENG100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I learned so many skills, and . She was a knowledgeable and caring professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (5 online, 1 in person), balancing majority support themes against one severe complaint. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Student Support

76/100

“She found so many resources for me to use a student with ADHD and a DSPS student.”

📝

68/100

“She gives out good feedback which really help me improve on my grammar and writing.”

⚠️ Uneven Experience Risk

40/100

“ . '. I asked for help but never got a reply.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Adapts the class to the students
  • always talking about random stuff
  • Shes a professor I felt comfortable with when asking for help.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She does give out a lot of homework
  • '
  • and a couple of

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She was a knowledgeable and caring professor.
  • if you have a problem, communicate with her.
  • Never help her students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews from 2020-2022 are recent and fairly detailed, but the sample is small and includes one extreme outlier.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

A004N2 reviews
ENGL1002 reviews
ENG0011 review
ENG1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1