AI Rate Professor

Music

Nadia Smelser

MUS145 · VOICE34 · MUS1 · MUS146 · MUS290 · VOICE2 · MUS141 · MUSIC244A · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

voice coach and is willing to practice and attend.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAmazing vocal coachGenerous graderInspirationalClear feedbackMust take for voice
  • Students rave about technical voice coaching that actually improves range, relaxation, and confidence.
  • if you practice, perform, and complete the concert report or paper.
  • and , so show up even though content feels manageable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

and that practice plus following instructions reliably yields an A, with listed grades all A.

Both the online A and if you do the work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

, though performances and practice still matter.

Online conservatory-linked section felt higher standard; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Attendance is repeatedly mandatory and .

; in-person comments are clearer about drop risk.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Near-universal praise and 100% would-take-again tone frame her as a must for voice students.

Recommendation is strong in both formats; almost .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Students call her a really easy or .

Format shift

Generosity is explicit in in-person reviews; the online review .

Workload

Light

74/100

Main load is practice, a few performances, and usually one manageable paper or concert report.

Format shift

Online section sounds a bit more rigorous; in-person intro voice is light-to-moderate.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Consistently described as , and transformative for singers.

Format shift

; the one online review is milder but still positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Assessment centers on in-class singing tests, performances, participation, and a paper rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Performance and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

as inspiring, clear, and confidence-building with .

Main concern

and public performances can intimidate shy students.

What students said

“She improved my voice so much in 16 weeks!”
MUS1
“Nadia is a genius. She's great at explaining the technical side of singing”
MUS145
“ !! Nadia will teach you to not only to improve your singing but also help you to actually overcome nervousness!”
VOICE34

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One online MUS290 student notes high standards and but and lectures.

Main concern

Only one online review limits how sure online workload and standards are.

What students said

“She gives you feedbacks for every small things you did, and her lectures could lure you in for more!”
MUS290

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are mainly performances and a .

In-class singing testsPerformancesOne paperClear guidelines

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

solo/group performances, and a paper with easy guidelines.

In-class singing testsPerformancesConcert report or paper
“One performance with classmates, and three by yourself. , but she gives you super easy guidelines to follow.”
MUS145
“the you have to sing in front of the class.”
MUS1

Online

Online review ; it focuses on feedback and standards.

Detailed feedbackHigh standards
“She requires high standard of those enrolled in this class due to its relevance to the 4th year conservatory system.”
MUS290

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want to learn.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews (1 online, 12 in person), highlighting coaching quality and grade ease. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ .”

🎁

88/100

“ ”

📣

30/100

“She's strict and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing Professor! Taught so well.
  • She's great at explaining the technical side of singing
  • Her techniques rock.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • graded generously
  • Just practice your music, do your concert report
  • you should get an A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • was kind
  • she is so encouraging
  • She is such a sweet lady!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen mostly detailed reviews across many years are highly , and .

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MUS13 reviews
MUS1412 reviews
MUS1452 reviews
MUSIC244A2 reviews
MUS1461 review
Show 3 more courses
MUS2901 review
VOICE21 review
VOICE341 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values