AI Rate Professor

English

Katie Neipris

ENGL100 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

class content may be easy, but mandatory attendance and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardMandatory attendanceHarsh paper graderDiscussion heavySo many papersPolarizing
  • Only two online ENGL100 reviews and they completely disagree on quality.
  • One student says content is easy but and .
  • The , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Even when content is called easy, one detailed review , so an A is not low-effort.

All evidence is online; no in-person reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

A strong student explicitly calls the class easy compared with hard STEM courses.

Course-easiness comments come only from the two online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

, and one says you must show up every class even after finishing all work.

; there are no in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

, so recommendation is a coin flip.

Both sides are online ENGL100 reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

One reviewer says she does everything , while the other is positive without detailing grade ease.

Format shift

Strict-paper-grade claim is online; .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Tags and and attendance demand.

Format shift

Workload evidence is entirely from the two online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Teaching is polarized between terrible harsh grader and .

Format shift

No in-person teaching evidence; average reflects the online split.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Papers, participation, and discussions dominate; exams are not clearly described.

Format shift

Assignment-heavy picture is online-only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one student calls her terrible with and feedback.

Main concern

Forced attendance even after .

What students said

“This was actually an easy class but the professor was terrible.”
ENGL100
“We get to read amazing articles and ! Love this class!”
ENGL100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and participation rather than a .

Many papersParticipation heavyNo clear exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online comments focus on papers and .

So many papersParticipation matters
“Also, she would do everything to .”
ENGL100
“We get to read amazing articles and !”
ENGL100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This was actually an easy class but the professor was terrible.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 online reviews with , so themes are provisional. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Polarized Teaching

48/100

“Love this class!”

🧱

28/100

“she would do everything to .”

📍

12/100

“You still have to show up every class .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the professor was terrible
  • awesome discussions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This was actually an easy class
  • So many papers

Theme 3

⏰

  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • You still have to show up every class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two short online reviews from 2021, fully contradictory, so confidence in any single conclusion is low.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL1002 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1