AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jennifer Giddings

MATHA120 · A030 · A160 · MATH030 · MATH160 · MATH115 · MATH120 · MATH008 · A120 · MATH130 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
69/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want a supportive math teacher who helps you learn, but expect , and real effort for a strong grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringLots of homeworkTest heavyAccessible outside classCan be disorganized
  • , and genuine care for success
  • Workload is consistently heavy with and test emphasis
  • A sizable minority cite last-minute changes, disorganization, and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

and help can lift grades, but tests and .

; in person more and fairness mix.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Math content is manageable with practice, but pace and volume keep it from feeling easy.

Both formats rate difficulty around moderate; online comments stress long, fast lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

, and several warn that skipping hurts your chance to pass.

Both Online and In as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Majority recommend her for care and and mixed organization.

Online and in-person praise is similar; negatives about workload appear in both.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Some call grading fair with ; others report tough grading and .

Format shift

mentioned in both formats; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and last-minute date changes dominate student complaints.

Format shift

and In person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and care are common; a minority call her unprepared or disorganized.

Format shift

In person has more interactive-class praise; online notes also praise fill-in notes and accessibility.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests and homework both matter, with many test-heavy comments and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize harder tests; in .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews emphasize interactive teaching and care for students, with , and occasional disorganization.

Main concern

, and some last-minute schedule changes.

What students said

“She cares deeply about her students and wants everyone to succeed.”
MATH160
“assigns A LOT of homework and , and only lets you know last minute.”
MATHA120
“ and has class participation so the lectures do not get too dry.”
MATH030

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students mostly like her support and fill-in notes, but report lots of , and .

Main concern

Easy to fall behind if absent; .

What students said

“assigns a lot of homework but its only to make sure you have plenty of practice with the material.”
MATH120
“Her lectures are very long and goes very fast, while she gives lots of homework and .”
MATH130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are a major grade driver and and pre-tests; proctoring details are not clearly proven.

Test heavyTests harder than homeworkExtra credit on testsPre-tests

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person classes are frequently test heavy, with notes for study, pre-tests, and occasional grade boosts or .

TEST HEAVYExtra credit on testsPre-testsPrinted notes for tests
“Also she gives a 10 % grade boost on tests”
MATH030
“she gives a .”
A120

Online

Online students report tests harder and some .

Test heavyTests harder than homeworkEXTRA CREDIT
“she gives lots of homework and .”
MATH130

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Giddings sincerely cares about her students and how they do. ... She is one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews (3 Online, 14 In person), highlighting care, workload, and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Hands down the life.”

📚 Heavy Workload

28/100

“assigns A LOT of homework and , and only lets you know last minute.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“ !”

❤️ Student Support

85/100

“She cares deeply about her students and wants everyone to succeed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She interacts a lot with class; calls on people and assigns group exercises
  • Her fill in notes was great.
  • and has class participation so the lectures do not get too dry.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • be ready to work!!
  • As long as you put in the effort its hard not to do well in her class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization & Workload

  • She can be a .
  • , but you wont find out till after you turned it in already
  • and expects us to have it done.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews span 2015-2021 with , and mixed organization.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

A1203 reviews
A0302 reviews
MATH0082 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
MATH1602 reviews
Show 6 more courses
0081 review
A1601 review
MATH0301 review
MATH1151 review
MATH1301 review
MATHA1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 5

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1