AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Kathryn Rogers

CS250 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want standard programming instruction and graded coding practice.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderDisappointing TeachingZero-Point AssignmentsWord Doc CodingAvoid for Programming
  • Only review rates her the .
  • , so practice work does not reward grades.
  • Requires writing code in a Word document that must compile bug-free instead of using an IDE.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Student earned a B+ but labels her a .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Difficulty is rated high and requirements feel unnatural compared with normal programming courses.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

and .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

.

Format shift

Only one in-person review.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Coding work exists but ; overall load is unclear beyond odd requirements.

Format shift

Only one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Described as the many prior courses.

Format shift

Only one in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Programming assignments worth zero implies non-assignment components drive the grade.

Format shift

Only one in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One in-person CS250 review calls teaching extremely disappointing with and Word-document coding requirements.

Main concern

Broken assessment design and must be done in Word.

What students said

“programming assignments are worth 0 points.”
CS250

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam proctoring style; assessment .

Programming Assignments Worth ZeroCode in Word Document

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

No webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

Zero-Point Programming AssignmentsCode Must Compile From Word
“She also thinks it is more important for you to write code into a word document and have it compile and work bug free rather than an IDE”
CS250

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I have taken 7 programming courses over 3 colleges and she has been the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting assessment design failures. Credibility rating: Low.

💥 Teaching Quality Collapse

12/100

“This professor was very disappointing.”

🧮

18/100

“programming assignments are worth 0 points.”

👎

8/100

“she has been the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very disappointing

Theme 2

📈 About Assessment

  • programming assignments are worth 0 points
  • write code into a word document and have it compile and work bug free rather than an IDE

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Single 2021 review is detailed and extreme but too limited for firm multi-semester conclusions.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CS2501 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values