AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Noushin Seddighzadeh

MATH160 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Solid MATH160 option if you will do the work; online is easier with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardQuiz retakesCondenses textbookCaring in personSelf-study onlineA is reachable
  • Both reviewers earned As in MATH160 with different effort levels by format
  • and
  • In person is harder but praised for and support

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

72/100

Both students got As; online multi-attempt quizzes make high scores especially reachable with steady work.

and easy quizzes; in person required tutoring hours and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is manageable with practice, though .

Online rated easier (difficulty 2); in person rated harder (difficulty 4).

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; in-person attendance was mandatory.

. In person: .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; the online student would not despite an easy A.

; in .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Multiple quiz and test attempts online plus achievable As show student-friendly scoring paths.

Format shift

Leniency is clearest in the online multi-attempt policy.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

About 4-7 weekly online assignments; in but not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

Online workload called average; in person HW takes time and effort.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

In person she condenses material excellently; online lectures feel boring and self-taught.

Format shift

In-person teaching praised; online lectures criticized.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of , and .

Format shift

Online multi-attempt quizzes/tests; in person standard HW and assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person MATH160 is hard but well taught with condensed notes, examples, and strong support.

Main concern

and effort.

What students said

“Hard class, great teacher!”
MATH160

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online MATH160 has easy homework and but boring lectures that force self-teaching.

Main concern

Lectures may not teach enough, so .

What students said

“For each quiz and until you are satisfied with your score.”
MATH160

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Online quizzes and tests allow multiple tries; overall assessment is relatively student-friendly.

Multiple quiz attemptsMultiple test attemptsHomework-driven

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly detail exam proctoring or .

Homework heavyIn-class examples
“HW takes time & effort. Hard class, great teacher!”
MATH160

Online

Quizzes and score.

Multiple quiz attemptsMultiple test attemptsEasy homework
“For each quiz and until you are satisfied with your score.”
MATH160

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall, do all your work and you will be fine.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in person). Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Professor Noushin did an excellent job of condensing and summarizing the text book curriculum for our class.”

🔁 Assessment Flexibility

78/100

“For each quiz and until you are satisfied with your score.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“Hard class, great teacher!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I found her lectures to be boring at times
  • did an excellent job of condensing and summarizing the text book curriculum
  • plenty of time for Q&A

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the homework and
  • do all your work and you will be fine
  • HW takes time & effort

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews, one per format, so conclusions rest on a very small sample.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1602 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values