AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Stanislav Dubrovskiy

MATHA280 · A030 · A285H · MATH280 · MATH185 · MATH170 · MATH280H · A185 · A180 · MATH30 · MATHA170 · MATH180 · MATH182H · A280 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
38.46%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless and can handle timed WebAssign-style exams.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnhelpful lecturesTough graderTest heavySelf-study requiredProctorio obsessed
  • ; most learning happens via WebAssign and outside study.
  • and As hard even when content is doable.
  • Online period drew heavy Proctorio use and cheating accusations that many students called unfair.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

and WebAssign practice help some students, but , and tough grading keep an A costly.

Both online and ; online adds proctoring stress.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Calc content plus fast or theoretical lectures and tests that do not match class examples make the material feel hard.

In-person comments dominate; online also rated difficulty at 5.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Most reviews say attendance is graded or required even when lectures feel unhelpful.

and in-person sections.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

About one in ; many urge picking any other calculus professor.

; online reviews are uniformly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Tough grader tags and limited and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize almost no partial credit; in person is mixed but still strict.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Daily WebAssign-style homework, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Lots of .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

; a minority like office hours and care.

Format shift

; online teaching feedback is nearly all poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and quizzes drawn from WebAssign more than class activity.

Format shift

Test-heavy pattern holds online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

mandatory attendance, theory-heavy lectures, lots of , and .

Main concern

You may attend every class yet still teach yourself most of the material.

What students said

“All learning is done ON YOUR OWN.”
MATH280
“Won't learn anything in lecture but .”
MATH185
“You end up teaching yourself because HW problems are very different than the ones presented in the lectures.”
A180

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Pandemic online Calc 3 was described as a nightmare: , and frequent cheating accusations.

Main concern

Proctorio proctoring and low trust made the online experience especially stressful.

What students said

“Uses Proctorio, accuses people of cheating, and apathetic.”
MATH280
“ if you don't want to deal with .”
MATHA280

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are timed and hard, often WebAssign-based, with online Proctorio and a harsh anti-cheating stance.

Timed testsWebAssign-based examsProctorio onlineLittle partial creditTest heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and limited time to finish.

Timed examsTest heavyWebAssign-based
“given the time limit you won't be able to finish all of the problems in time.”
MATH280
“ and .”
MATH170

Online

and tough grading.

ProctorioStrict proctoringTough exams
“Uses Proctorio, accuses people of cheating, and apathetic.”
MATH280
“ . A LOT OF HW. VERY LITTLE XTRA CREDIT GIVEN.”
MATHA280

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please dont get baited in this class. This class is a waste of money and time. He doesnt teach anything but forces you to go to class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews (2 online, 24 in , and recommendation themes. Credibility rating: High.

📚

32/100

“All learning is done ON YOUR OWN.”

⏱️

34/100

“given the time limit you won't be able to finish all of the problems in time.”

🚫 Low Recommendation

36/100

“Not sure how this guy is still teaching”

💻 Online Proctor Stress

30/100

“Uses Proctorio, accuses people of cheating, and apathetic.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures were not that helpful
  • What is taught in class isn't anything like the
  • He is very big on explaining concepts theoretically

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • lots of , do the HW and do them 1000 times, its calc 3 not an easy A class
  • Barely any partial credit

Theme 3

⚠️ and Workload

  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • Lots of homework
  • Won't learn anything in lecture but

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

26 detailed reviews spanning 2017-2020 , and uneven teaching.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 512

Course coverage

MATH2808 reviews
A1803 reviews
MATH1802 reviews
MATH1852 reviews
MATHA2802 reviews
Show 9 more courses
A0301 review
A1851 review
A2801 review
A285H1 review
MATH1701 review
MATH182H1 review
MATH280H1 review
MATH301 review
MATHA1701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1