AI Rate Professor

Orange Coast College · Psychology

Olga Stable

PSYC165 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

; the only review is strongly negative about political framing.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerToo politicalParticipation mattersNot recommendedSingle sparse review
  • Only one short review exists and it rates quality at 1/5.
  • The sole complaint is that the class is too political with participation mattering.
  • ; almost .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove how hard an A is; only difficulty rating 2 and a one-line complaint exist.

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

60/100

Self-reported difficulty is low (2/5), but the review gives no content detail beyond politics.

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as .

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

and quality rated 1 with a purely negative comment.

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove grading leniency beyond a low quality rating and no grade reported.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove workload; .

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Only feedback is quality 1 and that the course felt too political.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews ; participation is tagged as mattering.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Single in-person review gives quality 1 and says the course is too political with participation mattering.

Main concern

Perceived political bias with almost no other detail.

What students said

“Too political.”
PSYC165

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Too political.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with minimal detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫

10/100

“Too political.”

🗣️ Participation Focus

20/100

“Participation matters”

Theme 1

💬 About Course Tone

  • Too political.

Theme 2

📋 About Expectations

  • Participation matters

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

15/100

Evidence confidence

One vague 2020 review with no grade detail or multi-year confirmation makes all scores highly uncertain.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSYC1651 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values