AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Gilmore Gil

LEARN001 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

he may be a gifted tutor for some and a toxic mismatch for others.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing TutorAmazing Lectures or FavoritesCaring vs HostileHard Science ExplainerDSPS Office Context
  • One recent review calls him an exceptional multi-subject explainer who unlocked hard-science grades.
  • An older review alleges favoritism, cursing, and unprofessional treatment as a DSPS tutor.
  • With only two opposite experiences, reliability is low and the fit seems highly personal.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The positive review says an A took dedication and hard work, not .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

One student found concepts made easy; the other rated difficulty max and rejected him entirely.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

one strong yes for teaching gift, one strong no for alleged abuse.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Little hard grade-data detail; success is framed as effort-plus-help rather than free leniency.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not the main theme; conflict centers on tutoring style and professionalism.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

One 5-star teaching-gift story and one 1-star worst-tutor story cancel each other out.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews describe tutoring support more than a fixed exam-versus-homework course design.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and a report of abusive, favoritist behavior.

Main concern

Unprofessional conduct allegations and extreme inconsistency across only two voices.

What students said

“Professor Gil has a gift of teaching and mostly explaining hard concept better than any professor!”
LEARN001
“He cursed at me because I made a little mistake and used the F word at me.”
LEARN001

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; outcomes depend on tutoring relationship more than test format.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, or formal exam rules.

“I never got an A on hard science BUT Professor Gil made it happen with dedication and hard work.”
LEARN001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Gil has a gift of teaching and mostly explaining hard concept better than any professor!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting in-person reviews. Credibility rating: Low.

🌟 Teaching Gift

90/100

“you name it chemistry, math, physics, just ask and you will be amaze!”

🚨 Conduct Concern

10/100

“This guy should be fired from his job. .”

⚖️ Recommendation Split

50/100

“I advice students to not work with him because he has his favorites against his students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • gift of teaching and mostly explaining hard concept
  • Amazing lectures
  • Caring

Theme 2

💔 About Character

  • he has his favorites against his students
  • used the F word at me
  • Get out of OCC Gil.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews, years apart, with total contradiction and limited grade detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

LEARN0012 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1