AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Mike Holland

RELST100 · RE115 · RS115 · PHILO110 · PHILA100 · RLST130 · RELST115 · PHILO115 · RELIGIOUSSTUD · PHILOSOPHY110 · RELST130 · RLSTA110 · REL130 · PHIL110 · PHIL115 · PHILA110 · 41 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you can sit through long note-heavy lectures; open notes make a solid grade very achievable.

Best fit · Effort For RewardOpen-note examsHeavy note-takingEasy A if you take notesLong lecturesMind-opening content
  • if .
  • Lectures can feel long, dry, or PowerPoint-heavy for some students.
  • Content challenges beliefs and suits students open to academic religious studies.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Open notes, study guides, and make an A very attainable if you attend and write good notes.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, though volume of detail and long lectures add mild challenge.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as mandatory or needed for notes; missing class hurts because .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and insight, despite boredom complaints.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, and fair paper grading make good grades common.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

but heavy in-class note-taking plus a .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Many call him nice, insightful, and clear; others find lectures dull PowerPoint reading.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and finals with a few papers or reports and optional .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

items, and mind-opening religious studies content.

Main concern

Three-hour monotone lectures and nonstop note-taking can feel boring or overwhelming.

What students said

“U can , and finals.”
RLST130
“Show up to class, take good notes, you'll get an A.”
PHIL110
“he presents it in such a dull fashion.”
RLSTA110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

guides, making them student-friendly if notes are thorough.

Open notesStudy guidesOpen book mentionedIn-person examsExtra credit papers

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals allow notes and often study guides; no webcam or Lockdown Browser is mentioned.

Open notes on all testsStudy guidesNotes-heavy lecturesIn-person exams
“U can , and finals.”
RLST130
“ .”
PHILA110
“Easy A. Nice teacher. .”
PHIL110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Show up to class, take good notes, you'll get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 41 , and lecture style. Credibility rating: High.

📝 Open-Note Advantage

88/100

“U can , and finals.”

🎯 Easy A Path

84/100

“ . .”

😴 Lecture Energy

55/100

“This guy is a PLAIN BAGEL... bland enough to make you dread sitting in his class”

🧠 Mind Opening

80/100

“This class will really open your mind up to new possibilities about your own beliefs”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Interesting and informative lectures
  • reads PowerPoint for the entire 3 hour session
  • nice guy
  • monotone voice

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A
  • GOOD notes = A
  • but study guide really helps

Theme 3

📓 About Workload

  • taking good notes is a must
  • No book needed
  • two reports on houses of worship
  • papers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

41

Recent reviews read by the AI

41

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

41 in-person reviews over , and mixed lecture engagement.

Inside 41 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 57
3 out of 57
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1159 reviews
PHIL1107 reviews
RELST1307 reviews
RLST1303 reviews
REL1302 reviews
Show 12 more courses
RLSTA1102 reviews
320781 review
PHILA1001 review
PHILA1101 review
PHILO1101 review
PHILO1151 review
PHILOSOPHY1101 review
RE1151 review
RELIGIOUSSTUD1 review
RELST1001 review
RELST1151 review
RS1151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values