AI Rate Professor

Architectural Technology

William Itzen

ARCH155156 · ARCH156BIM2 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless and peers; expect little classroom support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMinimal In-Class TeachingTough GraderSelf-Teach RequiredVideo-ReliantAvoid for Support
  • Multiple students say he barely teaches and leaves learning to videos or classmates
  • Several report unhelpful or mocking responses to questions
  • Workload outside class is real and full credit is hard without outside help

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Students , and little guidance, so high marks require self-driven effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

BIM and architecture software work is hard when teaching support is minimal.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Some sections mark attendance mandatory, others do not, with mixed student reports.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most substantive reviews warn not to take him for credit, knowledge, or GPA.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

and comments about hard-to-earn full scores dominate negative reviews.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Course requires substantial outside work and weekly assignments beyond short class talks.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

26/100

Students say he gives short speeches, relies on videos, and may mock questions instead of teaching.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

and project-style work drive the class more than formal exams in the comments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

short lectures, video reliance, and uneven support.

Main concern

Instructor may not teach content and can discourage questions.

What students said

“Horrible teacher. If you have any problem don't ask him. He will make fun of you before answering your question”
ARCH156BIM2
“I could have taken this class without Itzen”
ARCH156BIM2
“If you don't have any friend or any sources, you absolutely fail class”
155

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and , so exam risk is not clearly proven.

Homework-Driven AssessmentVideo-Supported Tasks

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam format; assessment centers on weekly work and course projects.

Weekly AssignmentsOutside Class Work
“He gave a 5 minute speech, and was done”
ARCH156BIM2
“Course requires work outside of class time”
ARCH155156

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I could have taken this class without Itzen. He gave a 5 minute speech, and was done.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting weak teaching support and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

26/100

“He doesn't teach but he wants you know everything.”

🚫 Support and Attitude

22/100

“If you have any problem don't ask him. He will make fun of you before answering your question.”

📚

38/100

“If you don't have any friend or any sources, you absolutely fail class.”

👍 Recommendation

32/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Horrible teacher
  • I could have taken this class without Itzen

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • hard to get full sore
  • just waste your time

Theme 3

🧰 About Learning Support

  • I got help from other classmates and another teacher
  • Itzen himself taught me absolutely nothing!
  • and direct

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only seven reviews, mixed extremes, limited grade detail, and short comments reduce confidence.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ARCH1551563 reviews
ARCH156BIM22 reviews
1551 review
1561 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

4

B 3 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values