AI Rate Professor

Allied Health

Daryl Isaac

A160 · CVT160 · CARDI0391 · CVT220 · CVT · CVT100 · CT160 · CVT170 · CVTPROGRAM · CVTALL · A170 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can fully self-teach the CVT material and tolerate a frustrating classroom.

Best fit · Self Taught ProOutdated MaterialsDoes Not TeachHot TemperedSelf-Teach RequiredNot Student Advocate
  • Most students say he rarely lectures and relies on decades-old materials
  • Many report a hot temper and poor respect for students after program entry
  • Grades can be fine if you teach yourself, but real-world career prep feels weak

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students report As and A+s with graded-by-few-things policies even while saying they learned little from him.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Program content is not trivial, but confusion comes more from poor teaching and outdated materials than pure concept difficulty.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

while others do not, with mixed enforcement across reviews.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and most detailed comments warn others away from the program experience.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

82/100

Multiple students report high letter grades despite little teaching and few graded items.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload centers on projects and , though exams use old material.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Dominant theme is unclear teaching, old materials, storytelling instead of instruction, and a hostile or disengaged style.

Format shift

A few early positive reviews exist, but later detailed reviews are strongly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Mix of projects, sparse graded items, and exams that students say are outdated or open-book relative to class materials.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person CVT and allied health courses are widely described as , and low on real instruction, with frequent frustration and self-teaching.

Main concern

You may get a grade but leave unprepared for the field and frustrated by temperament and outdated content.

What students said

“Doesn't like answering questions or updating the old course materials”
CVT160
“I have not ONCE had ONE lecture, presentation, or a learning experience from this professor”
CVT170
“Teach yourself or expect to fail at this career in the real world”
A170

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

At least some tests are open-book and poorly aligned to updated instruction, so .

Open BookOutdated Exam MaterialsSelf-Study Heavy

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams drawn from old materials rather than current lectures.

Open BookOutdated Exam Materials
“The because you will learn more from your classmates than you will from him”
CVTALL
“ and not from assigned class material”
CVT160

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Teach yourself or expect to fail at this career in the real world”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 in-person reviews spanning 2006-2017, emphasizing teaching failure, temperament, and self-teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“He does not teach, just sits there and tells stories and useless information”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“How is this teacher even able to teach here?”

📚 Outdated Content

30/100

“Previous teacher must've been great since he's still using her material decades later”

🅰️ Grade vs Learning Gap

78/100

“GRADED BY FEW THINGS”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't like answering questions or updating the old course materials
  • He does not teach, just sits there and tells stories
  • and disorganized

Theme 2

😤 About Temper and Respect

  • He is so hot tempered, rude, and nasty to his students
  • He hates his job and has told people outside of the school district that he is only here for a paycheck
  • Be prepared to be upset and frustrated everyday in his class

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • mostly you have to learn on your own
  • You don't learn from his class at all

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen in-person reviews span many years with consistent negative themes, though a few older positives and some empty comments reduce perfect confidence.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 59

Course coverage

CVT1603 reviews
CVTALL3 reviews
A1601 review
A1701 review
CARDI03911 review
Show 6 more courses
CT1601 review
CVT1 review
CVT1001 review
CVT1701 review
CVT2201 review
CVTPROGRAM1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values