AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Kristi Genoway

ART111 · 2DDESIGN · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid unless and can stay low-profile while .

Best fit · Effort For RewardMoody and rudeTalks too muchUnclear expectationsHard to pleaseProject-based studio
  • Many students describe rude, moody, and belittling classroom behavior.
  • and she is hard to please.
  • An A is possible if you keep quiet, meet deadlines, and use resubmits.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Content is not elite-hard and resubmits help, but unclear standards and and caution.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Projects are often basic arts-and-crafts level, though the material.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and note she nags about lateness and showing up to critiques.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

and most students warn others away due to rudeness and confusion.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some allow resubmits and say an A is reachable with work, but others report inconsistency and harsh critiques.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Studio projects and group work keep you busy, but comments rarely describe an .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Average quality is low; frequent , and unclear instruction outweigh sparse praise.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and resubmissions rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

long tangents, harsh critiques, and .

Main concern

Rude demeanor and itself is not advanced.

What students said

“I'm still haunted by how rudely Professor Genoway behaved herself!”
ART111
“no one knew what she wanted and she was hard to please”
2DDESIGN
“She was inconsistent with grading.”
ART111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects and critiques more than formal exams, so .

Project critiquesResubmit projectsGroup projects

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; formal exam policy is not clearly described.

Studio projectsCritiquesResubmits allowed
“She allows us to resubmit the .”
ART111
“Be punctual, show up to the critiques, pay your $20 materials fee, turn in ”
ART111

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dont take her class! but she doesnt focus on the main idea”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 in-person reviews, highlighting demeanor, clarity, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

😤 Classroom Demeanor

22/100

“I'm still haunted by how rudely Professor Genoway behaved herself!”

❓

30/100

“no one knew what she wanted and she was hard to please”

📈 Grade Path

55/100

“Keep you head low and you will pass the class with a A”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she keeps talking about her experiences and feelings
  • She talks way too much and usually confuses students
  • she can be obnoxious but she really does want the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The class wasn't hard at all but Kristi makes it a torturous experience
  • it's not hard to get an A if you really work for it
  • She was inconsistent with grading

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • This Professor can be moody so watch out
  • Hard to know what she want, hard to please
  • . I think teaching not the right job

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen detailed in-person reviews span many years with consistent themes on demeanor and , though many are older and grade data is thin.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ART11114 reviews
2DDESIGN2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values