AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rodgers Niiboye Simpson

COS1243 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

; reviews describe a toxic attitude and the .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHorrible AttitudeWorst ProfessorUnpleasantAvoid
  • Consistently rated quality 1/5 across reviews
  • Described as having a horrible attitude and being unpleasant
  • and call him the

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

No grade data and one course rated very hard; nothing suggests an easy path to an A.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Difficulty ratings span easy to very hard, but tone is negative rather than beginner-friendly.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

At .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Both reviews are quality 1 with and .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

No positive grading comments; overall experience is harshly negative.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not described in detail; difficulty ratings conflict between courses.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students call the attitude horrible and label him the .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Both in-person reviews slam the professor for attitude and overall quality, with .

Main concern

Unpleasant interpersonal style and extremely poor teaching experience.

What students said

“Horrible attitude and very unpleasant to be with”
COS1243
“ . I have ever studied with. Period.”
1111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . I have ever studied with. Period.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting attitude and quality collapse. Credibility rating: Low.

💢 Teaching Quality

8/100

“ . I have ever studied with. Period.”

😠 Attitude

5/100

“Horrible attitude and very unpleasant to be with”

👎 Recommendation

5/100

“No”

Theme 1

😠 About Attitude

  • Horrible attitude and very unpleasant to be with
  • . I have ever studied with

Theme 2

📉 About Overall Experience

  • No

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only two short, older reviews (2014-2016) with consistent negativity but little detail on course structure.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

11111 review
COS12431 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values