AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Aleksandra Khizhnyak

MATHA030 · MATH30 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; both reviews call the experience a waste of time.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerNot a teacherStrong accentImpatientNo helpExtremely difficult
  • Both reviews rate quality 1 and difficulty 5 with zero praise.
  • Students say she erases her own work and offers little help.
  • if you struggle in math.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Difficulty is maxed out and comments show no path to a solid grade without huge struggle.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

5/100

Both students call the material very difficult with no effective teaching support.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

; no flexibility is described.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students and say she is not even a teacher.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

No grades reported and tone implies zero leniency with max difficulty.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Comments stress extreme ; struggle is constant.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students report no help, self-erasing work, impatience, and that she is not a teacher.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

as chaotic, unhelpful, and extremely hard with no patience for struggling students.

Main concern

, and very high difficulty.

What students said

“Dont waste your time, no help very difficult.”
MATHA030
“ if you value your life”
MATH30

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dont waste your time, no help very difficult. Half of the time she is erasing her own work while student have to correct her!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching failure and extreme difficulty. Credibility rating: Low.

💀 Teaching Quality

8/100

“If you struggle in .”

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“ if you value your life”

🔥 Difficulty

5/100

“Dont waste your time, no help very difficult.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Half of the time she is erasing her own work while student have to correct her!
  • Strong accent and not patient with students.
  • not even a teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • no help very difficult
  • if you value your life

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old 2015 reviews, both extremely negative and short, with no grade data.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH301 review
MATHA0301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values