AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Andrew Knoid

MATH160 · MATH185 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Proceed only if you can verify current teaching quality; older reviews range from disaster to easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing Math InstructorExam Matches HomeworkConstant MistakesEasy A When ClearInconsistent Quality
  • and best-math-professor praise
  • so
  • Very small old sample makes the overall picture unreliable

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

One student earned As across multiple courses and , while the other never reported grades amid poor teaching.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Average difficulty is low and one review calls content super easy, but the other found the .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Neither review clearly .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One review calls him the while the other describes a .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Reported As and exams pulled from homework suggest grades are achievable with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

and difficulty ratings stay low, with no reports of heavy projects.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is polarized between constant mistakes and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework and problems.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one student reports constant lecture and worksheet errors that waste class time, while another calls him the from homework.

Main concern

Quality may swing from clear example-based teaching to frequent mistakes that confuse the class.

What students said

“he made constant mistakes as your trying to learn and because he added something wrong you would spend class time having to do the problem all over again”
MATH160
“The exam questions are exactly in the homework. So if class.”
MATH185

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as , so doing the .

Exams Match HomeworkHomework-Driven Success

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

homework is the main path to an A.

Exams Match Homework
“The exam questions are exactly in the homework. So if class.”
MATH185

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is the . He usually uses examples to show the lectures. Super easy to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting polarized teaching quality and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“I took him this summer for stats and it was the worse class he made constant mistakes as your trying to learn”

📈 Easy A Path

78/100

“The exam questions are exactly in the homework. So if class.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“He is the . He usually uses examples to show the lectures.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he made constant mistakes as your trying to learn
  • He usually uses examples to show the lectures. Super easy to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The
  • I took his math 170, 180, and 185, and got all A.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting reviews from 2014 with limited grade and .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1601 review
MATH1851 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values