AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Michael Scott

PHILOSOPHY150 · PHILA150 · PHILO100 · LOGIC150 · LOG150 · PHIL150 · PHILINTR · ENG150 · PHILO150 · PHIL100 · 83 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you can handle tangents, memorize definitions word-for-word, and grind the .

Best fit · Self Taught ProOff-Topic TangentsVerbatim DefinitionsHuge Extra CreditTemperamentalLove-Him-Or-Hate-Him
  • Many students call him unprofessional, off-topic, and ego-driven rather than a clear teacher.
  • Grades can be rescued by a and verbatim memorization.
  • Attendance and staying on his good side matter; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible mainly via huge and word-for-word definition memorization, not easy teaching.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Material and delivery are ; many say lectures do not prepare you for the tests.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and missing class means missing material and grade impact.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most reviews warn to stay away due to poor teaching, unprofessional behavior, and harsh testing.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

Verbatim answers, failed essays, and disputed grades dominate; can still rescue some students.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Little regular homework, but large and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Frequent digressions, anger, and ego focus overshadow instruction for most students.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Written tests and essays drive the grade, with as the main softener.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person philosophy and logic sections are polarizing: funny and smart for a minority, but widely seen as digressive, harsh, and unprofessional.

Main concern

Off-topic personal stories, anger, and and .

What students said

“Don't waste your time and money like I did”
PHIL150
“he is not a teacher and does not teach”
PHIL150
“If given the chance, DO the ! . Got me an easy A.”
PHIL150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests demand word-for-word answers; huge can swing grades but .

Verbatim DefinitionsWritten TestsMassive Extra CreditAttendance Critical

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests reward verbatim memorization of his definitions; can outweigh multiple tests.

Word-for-Word AnswersExtra Credit ProjectFew Essays or Tests
“ word or its wrong”
PHIL150
“There is a large project that has more points than the first 2 tests put together”
PHIL150
“Memorize definitions, it's not that hard”
PHIL150

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't waste your time and money like I did”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, highlighting digressions, harsh testing, and low recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Teaching Quality

28/100

“he is not a teacher and does not teach”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“ .”

📝 Lifeline

55/100

“If given the chance, DO the ! . Got me an easy A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He spends a lot of time distracted talking about other subjects
  • he goes on a tangent everyday of class
  • 90% of what he talks about is not on the test

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • answered word for word or its wrong
  • 2 tests put together

Theme 3

😤 About Professionalism

  • Most unprofessional professor I've met
  • He is not interested in helping students learn
  • UNLESS YOU WANT TO BE MISERABLE!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

83

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty in-person reviews spanning years show a and consistent themes.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 517
3 out of 57
2 out of 519
1 out of 531

Course coverage

PHIL15027 reviews
PHIL1009 reviews
PHILA1504 reviews
PHILO1503 reviews
PHILOSOPHY1502 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ENG1501 review
LOG1501 review
LOGIC1501 review
PHILINTR1 review
PHILO1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values