AI Rate Professor

English

Geoffrey Ballah

ENG098 · ENGA098 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

; both reviews describe rude, unclear instruction with little respect for students.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRude to StudentsUnclear AnswersBelittlingAvoidNo Respect
  • Both reviews describe rude, dismissive treatment of student questions.
  • and .
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

20/100

Reviews give no path to success and stress unhelpful, hostile teaching with .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

High difficulty ratings and comments that teaching did not make sense make the course hard to learn from.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Both and call him among the worst.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

No positive grade signals; tone suggests unsupportive evaluation and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is not detailed; and clarity rather than assignment volume.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students report mockery, speaking over questions, and teachings that did not make sense.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person developmental English is described as , and .

Main concern

Students report mockery and unanswered questions with .

What students said

“ . He makes fun of his students when they get an answer wrong.”
ENG098
“ .”
ENGA098

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting rudeness and . Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Teaching Quality

15/100

“his teachings didn't make sense”

🚫 Recommendation

10/100

“ .”

😤 Student Respect

12/100

“He has no respect for the students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his teachings didn't make sense
  • he will speak over you before you finish
  • He can't spell, makes things awkward for the class

Theme 2

😤 About Character

  • He makes fun of his students when they get an answer wrong
  • He has no respect for the students
  • It's not even worth the credits having to deal with him

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

; consistent and harsh, but the tiny sample limits confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG0981 review
ENGA0981 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values