AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

A Khizhnyak

MATH · MATH8 · MATH030 · MATH010 · MATH160 · M120 · MATH30 · MATHA030 · MATH120 · MATH10 · MATH008 · MATH180 · M30 · MATH130 · MATH5 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

unless you already master the material and can learn almost entirely on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh GraderHard to UnderstandUnclear LecturesSelf-Teach RequiredAvoid
  • Most students say lectures are due to accent, pace, and frequent board mistakes.
  • as very harsh with and little partial credit flexibility.
  • Many report needing tutors or self-teaching from the book because questions are poorly answered.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

14/100

, and unforgiving point deductions make an A feel out of reach for most.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

16/100

Students say material feels harder because well taught.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

, though lateness and unpreparedness draw negative attention from the professor.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Overwhelming majority urge students to stay away and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students report , and refusal to accept alternative valid methods.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Heavy homework and demanding load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

14/100

, and frequent mistakes that confuse students more.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades appear driven by tests and and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math sections are widely described as , and unhelpful, with only a few students finding office hours useful.

Main concern

Communication barriers and students who need support.

What students said

“I couldnt understand her lectures if my life depended on it. I was a straight A student until I unfortunately met Ms. Khizhnyak. .”
MATH30
“Bad teacher... and confuses you more. Makes fun of students and doesn't take advice from students. Very rude and .”
MATH120
“ . she has an accent but her english is very clear.”
MATH010

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and are described as hard-graded with trick wording and little flexibility.

Test HeavyHarsh GradingNo Dropped TestsHomework on TestsNot Multiple Choice

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

described as harsh, non-multiple-choice, and based on homework-style problems.

Harsh Test GradingNo Dropped Lowest TestHomework Problems on TestsNot Multiple Choice
“ , and the only points u get are from the tests.”
M120
“ . She grades very hard and will only give you 2 points for a whole chapter's hw.”
MATH10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , if you do make sure to go to her study groups which are useless anyways, her accents very deep but understandable, very very harsh grader. , and the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 in-person reviews with strong negative consensus on clarity and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“ , stay away!this is hell!”

🗣️ Communication Barrier

15/100

“She cannot speak english well makes many mistakes, and she will charge you points for any reason she feels neccesary”

📉

12/100

“Very rude and . She will not accept any way to do problems except her own”

📚 Self Teaching

18/100

“Mostly i study on my own, good luck to all of her students!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Clarity

  • notes are copied right from textbook-waste of time. .
  • messes up on examples alot of times which clearly shows she needs more practice
  • Class was a waste of time because she would just do problems on the board and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • if you like a C, go for it!!!
  • and
  • she will charge you points for any reason she feels neccesary

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • Called me stupid infront of the class.
  • Makes fun of students and .
  • she will embarass you like a high school teacher!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-three mostly detailed reviews over many years are highly consistent in warning about teaching clarity and .

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 517

Course coverage

MATH103 reviews
MATH1203 reviews
MATH1303 reviews
MATH2 reviews
MATH0302 reviews
Show 10 more courses
M1201 review
M301 review
MATH0081 review
MATH0101 review
MATH1601 review
MATH1801 review
MATH301 review
MATH51 review
MATH81 review
MATHA0301 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values