AI Rate Professor

English

Scott Hayes

ENG101 · ENG099 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Must take Scott Hayes if you want an engaging, helpful English professor who builds real writing skill.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyBest on CampusMakes English FunHelpful PersonalityEssay Writing GrowthMust Take
  • Students call him one of the .
  • He makes English interesting even for students who dislike the subject.
  • Essays are required but manageable and improve writing skills.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

but the class is not a free ride; it pushes writing ability with fair effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Difficulty is moderate; content is approachable and , though not effortless.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

as a best-on-campus must-take professor.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Essays were not hard and students felt supported, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

He assigns quite a few essays, but students say they were not hard and were worthwhile.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students praise his personality, passion for poetry and film, and ability to make English interesting.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment centers on multiple essays and writing growth rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, help, and making literature interesting.

Main concern

Expect though they are not described as hard.

What students said

“One of the ! I really don't like English but he made it so interesting.”
ENG099
“ !!!! LOVED HIM ! It wasn't an easy class but it pushed your abilities to become a better writer.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe essay writing as the core assessment and do not mention strict proctored exams.

Multiple essaysWriting-focused assessmentNo exam details mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment is essay-heavy with no mention of closed-book or proctored testing.

EssaysWriting assignments
“He does make you write a quite a few essays but they weren't hard at all.”
ENG099

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the ! I really don't like English but he made it so interesting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting enthusiasm for teaching and essay-based growth. Credibility rating: Low.

🌟 Teaching Quality

95/100

“One of the !”

❤️ Personality and Help

92/100

“He has such a great personality and is .”

✍️ Writing Growth

88/100

“It wasn't an easy class but it pushed your abilities to become a better writer.”

👍

96/100

“ !!!! LOVED HIM !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he made it so interesting
  • His passion for poetry and film and how to
  • this english class changed the way I felt about literature

Theme 2

📈 About Work and Grades

  • He does make you write a quite a few essays but they weren't hard at all
  • It wasn't an easy class but it pushed your abilities to become a better writer.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • such a great personality and is
  • RECOMMENDED !!!
  • !!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two glowing but older reviews exist, so confidence is limited despite strong consistency.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG0991 review
ENG1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values