AI Rate Professor

Economics

Sezer Pehlivan

ECON100 · ECON20 · ECONECON · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if ; only take her if and want relatively easy tests.

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring LecturesSelf-Teach RequiredHard to UnderstandEasy Exams if You StudyHeavy Accent
  • Lectures are widely called boring and , so most students teach themselves from the book.
  • if you use the study guide, and .
  • Class enrollment often drops sharply by the end of the term.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades are reachable if and study guide; as easy and partly take-home.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Material volume is high and lectures do not help, so students rate content and delivery as hard.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students because , and unhelpful.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Exams and quizzes are described as manageable; late current-event work was accepted in one course.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and periodic current-event topics.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Students say lectures are boring, hard to understand, and questions go unanswered.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grade mix includes online quizzes plus midterms and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person lectures are boring and hard to understand; students rely on the , and .

Main concern

Weak lecturing forces self-teaching and many students leave the class.

What students said

...lectures are extremely boring and difficult to understand..i had to from the book
ECON20
Had to whole course with the book. Her midterm and though, half of .
ECON20
As long as you throughly go through the study guide before a
ECON100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Midterms and finals are described as easy when you use the study guide, with .

Partly Take-Home ExamsStudy Guide FocusedOnline Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews say midterms and finals are easy and .

Partly Take-HomeStudy GuideOnline Quizzes
Her midterm and though, half of . And she bases a significant amount of .
ECON20
As long as you throughly go through the study guide before a
ECON100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

...lectures are extremely boring and difficult to understand..i had to from the book

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews (2008-2013), highlighting weak lecturing and . Credibility rating: Medium.

😴 Lecture Quality

22/100

lectures are super boring and pointless because everything u need to know is in the book. had to

📚

30/100

Had to whole course with the book

📝

72/100

Her midterm and though, half of

👎 Recommendation

18/100

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are extremely boring and difficult to understand
  • doesn't answer questions and lectures are super boring
  • Heavy accent with a stutter

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • if u read u will be fine
  • midterm and though, half of
  • if you study the notes and books, it's possible to get an A

Theme 3

🚪 About Class Experience

  • the class was full when it started and there were less than 15 students by the end
  • of once a week

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed but old in-person reviews (2008-2013) show consistent complaints about teaching with limited grade data.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ECON203 reviews
ECON1001 review
ECONECON1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values