AI Rate Professor

English

Michael Paransky

ENGLISH101 · ENGLISH100 · ENG101 · ENGLISH · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you like discussion-style English and can tolerate slow, dry lectures.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerBoring LecturesDiscussion StyleTough but FairRewrite AllowedLight Writing Load
  • Students split between finding him insightful and finding him extremely boring.
  • , but rewrites make outcomes feel fairer.
  • Workload is lighter than typical English composition for some students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

A solid grade is possible with rewriting and moderate work, but he is still called a .

; no online reviews were available.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content and essay expectations feel standard, with some students calling readings and .

; no online reviews were available.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

, but zoning out or reading other material in class draws annoyance.

; no online reviews were available.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation hinges on whether you like discussion, English content, and can handle dry delivery.

; no online reviews were available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

call fair.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

Several students say writing load is not excessive and class is not overburdening.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

He is seen as intelligent and sometimes helpful, but also boring, slow, or unprepared by others.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and rewrites more than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person English feels discussion-heavy and uneven: smart and .

Main concern

Long, dull class sessions can make staying engaged difficult.

What students said

“He helped .”
ENG101
“Extremely intellegent man, but really really boring!”
ENGLISH101
“He is a but he gives you the chance to rewrite so I think he is very fair.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essays and .

Essay FocusRewrite OpportunityDiscussion-Based Class

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and discussion; exam logistics are not clearly proven in reviews.

EssaysRewrites
“He doesn't assign an excessive amount of writing. He is a but he gives you the chance to rewrite so I think he is very fair.”
ENG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a but he gives you the chance to rewrite so I think he is very fair. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting mixed engagement and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“I thought he was a good teacher.Class was more like a discussion group so if your into learning via the socratic method than go for it.”

😴 Engagement Level

30/100

“Dude this guy redefines boring, i sit here essentially playing on the computer all the time”

⚖️

52/100

“He is a but he gives you the chance to rewrite so I think he is very fair.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Class was more like a discussion group
  • Extremely intellegent man, but really really boring!
  • Boring. Does not know what to do with all the class time

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • He doesn't assign an excessive amount of writing
  • If you want an easy class with a
  • He helped .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

50/100

Evidence confidence

Seven mixed 2004-2005 reviews show consistent themes on boredom and fairness, but sample size and age limit confidence.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1014 reviews
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH1001 review
ENGLISH1011 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values