AI Rate Professor

Economics

Jennifer Vaughan

ECON100 · ECOA175 · MACRO2416 · ECON175 · MACRO175 · MACRO150 · ECON180 · ECONA · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid if ; only take her if you can self-teach economics and show up for .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPowerPoint readerRobotic lecturesAttendance requiredSelf-study heavyNice but unclear
  • Students and lectures feel robotic or impersonal.
  • Passing , and self-study even when teaching feels weak.
  • Attendance and , and many advise avoiding her if .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Some report easy passes or an A- with light studying, but others need heavy book work and still risk failing without it.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is not advanced for many, yet confusing lectures and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and lectures keep students until the end, with little flexibility described.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most warn others , and little classroom connection.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Homework and and some get B or A- with moderate effort, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

material itself is not conceptually brutal.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

, and little ability to clarify concepts.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and tests all matter, with tests often tied to quiz material.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person economics sections feel like slide-reading with , and limited connection, though a and say the class is passable.

Main concern

Boring robotic lectures and .

What students said

“lectures are ”
ECONA
“she is extremely impersonal and robotic”
MACRO150
“Never read the book and still got an A-.”
ECON100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests often track online quizzes or prior-semester exams, but success .

Quiz-Based TestsPrevious Semester TestsAnswer Keys SharedBook-Dependent

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and she may share prior tests with answers.

Quiz-Based TestsPrevious Semester TestsAnswer Keys Shared
“ .”
ECON100
“she gives you the and gives you all of the answers to them”
ECON180

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I would never suggest taking her class to anyone.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews, highlighting weak lectures, workload, and passability. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“All she does is read off her powerpoint in class.”

👎 Recommendation Level

24/100

“I would never suggest taking her class to anyone.”

📚

62/100

“MUST READ BOOK! However its not hard. i BARELY studied & got away with a B”

📍

18/100

“lectures are ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • extremely impersonal and robotic
  • lecturing style is so impersonal and robotic

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very easy class to pass
  • but pretty easy
  • if you don't read book good luck

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • but most of the time lashes out
  • She is a very nice, but her teaching style isn't

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

11 mostly detailed in-person reviews from a short period are consistent on weak teaching, but the sample is moderate and older.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECON1003 reviews
ECON1802 reviews
ECOA1751 review
ECON1751 review
ECONA1 review
Show 3 more courses
MACRO1501 review
MACRO1751 review
MACRO24161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values