AI Rate Professor

English

Carlos Delgado

ENG101 · ENGL101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are a strong writer ready for , and perfection-level expectations.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy weekly readingExpects perfectionSocratic lecture styleAvoid if seeking easy A
  • Constant readings and weekly questions make the class very hard
  • Students say he pretends to care while
  • Widely framed as a waste of time for anyone wanting an easy English class

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

He expects perfection; and grades look brutal.

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

, and full-class Socratic talk make it extremely hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, but weekly talk participation is required once a week.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Both and call the class a waste of time or money.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students say he expects perfection and weak writers are screwed.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Constant reading assignments plus weekly questions create a heavy load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Described as irresponsible and only pretending to care while overdoing the college experience.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Heavy weekly readings, questions, and essay perfection dominate assessment talk.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person ENG101 is high-pressure with , and perfectionist grading.

Main concern

Students call it a waste of time and money if you want any ease.

What students said

If you're looking for an easy class this definitely isn't it and was a waste of time/money.
ENGL101
. He is an irresponsible teacher and all he does is .
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews stress weekly questions and Socratic lecture talk more than formal exams.

Socratic discussionWeekly questions

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize constant readings, weekly questions, and Socratic-style class .

Socratic discussionWeekly questions
The as well as the questions due every week. You also have to talk in a Socratic style for the whole class lecture time once a week.
ENGL101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

. He is an irresponsible teacher and all he does is .

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting harsh expectations and heavy workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

. He is an irresponsible teacher and all he does is .

📚 Workload Intensity

12/100

The as well as the questions due every week.

🚫 Recommendation

15/100

If you're looking for an easy class this definitely isn't it and was a waste of time/money.

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Wants to give you the "college experience" but takes it to a whole other level
  • talk in a Socratic style for the whole class lecture time once a week

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He expects perfection
  • if you are not an
  • If you're looking for an easy class this definitely isn't it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Two consistent negative reviews from 2012 with detailed workload and personality complaints, but small sample and old dates.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1011 review
ENGL1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values