AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jose Villalobos

MATH030 · MATH185 · MATH170 · MATH160 · MATH157 · MATH120 · MATH70 · MATH180 · MATH154 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if , and can self-study math when lectures feel unclear.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to FollowHelpful If You AskAccent BarrierHomework-Driven TestsMixed Clarity
  • , so many students self-teach or use tutoring.
  • Homework and review sheets matter far more than lecture notes for passing tests.
  • if you engage, but passive students struggle hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

An A is realistic if and review sheets, but lectures alone will not get you there.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is standard lower-division math, but students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, though skipping without doing work is repeatedly linked to failure.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

and worth taking if you ask for help, while many warn he is and not ideal if math is already weak.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Several students call him reasonable or a pushover, yet some report few C-or-better test passes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Online or and strongly tied to test success, but not described as overwhelming busywork.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Helpful and straightforward for students who engage, but frequent complaints about dull, confusing, hard-to-understand lectures.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

yet is essential preparation for straightforward concept tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

: some find tests fair and help available when asked, while others call lectures dull, hard to understand, and self-taught.

Main concern

and accent-related confusion force heavy outside study.

What students said

“ and simple. He's not trying to fail you just know you have the concept down well.”
MATH180
“ . what really gets me is he just doesnt care whether anyone actually understands”
MATH160
“if you do the !!”
MATH154

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are generally concept-based and straightforward if proctoring details.

Straightforward TestsHomework-LinkedConcept Focus

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

reward homework practice more than lecture notes alone.

Straightforward TestsHomework-Linked
“ and simple.”
MATH180
“if you don't do it, you won't pass the tests.”
MATH154

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if you do the !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2012, highlighting clarity, homework, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📚

56/100

“if you do the !!”

🗣️ Clarity Problems

48/100

“ .”

🙋 Help If You Ask

58/100

“if you ask him for help he will help you 100%.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • hard to understand, but helpful IF YOU ASK FOR IT
  • He is dull and
  • and is very helpfull towards his students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you do the !!
  • and simple
  • For tests, usually only like 4 people passed with C's

Theme 3

🗣️ About Communication

  • does not speak english clearly, which causes disinterest
  • his english is cool give him aa break
  • Does have an accent, but understable

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen mostly older in-person reviews (2005-2012) give mixed but repeated themes; limited grade data and .

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1545 reviews
MATH1603 reviews
MATH0302 reviews
1571 review
MATH1201 review
Show 5 more courses
MATH1571 review
MATH1701 review
MATH1801 review
MATH1851 review
MATH701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values