AI Rate Professor

English

Hiba Taylor

ENG100 · ENGL101 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take her only if and ; skip if you need an easy, low-stress English class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrict Essay GraderHelpful Office HoursHeavy Writing LoadMany DropLecture Heavy
  • Most older reviews praise help outside class and real learning from heavy writing.
  • One recent review calls her incompetent and tells students to run.
  • and many students dropped.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Students say she grades hard and you need lots of essay time and rhetorical craft for strong marks.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

, but expectations and writing volume raise the challenge.

Based only on in-person course comments.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

At ; others do not contradict a strict vibe.

Attendance detail comes from in-person ENG100.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Four older reviews rate her highly for help and learning, while a recent review says run.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Multiple students say she grades hard and essays never feel good enough.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of writing, a , and textbook use make the load high.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Often called helpful and , but one recent review hits competence hard.

Format shift

Teaching views are all in-person and somewhat split by era.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Essays, rhetorical devices, and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and outside help but feel strict, writing-heavy, and polarizing.

Main concern

Strict expectations plus a and frustration for some.

What students said

she grades hard but if you ask for help outside/during class.
ENG100
Run if you can. falsy passionate about coaching and mentoring.
ENG100
The if you have other classes or a job
ENGL101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on essays and a heavy final project rather than clearly described proctored exams.

Essay-focusedFinal project

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews emphasize essays and a ; proctoring is not clearly described.

Heavy essaysFinal projectRhetorical devices
The if you have other classes or a job
ENGL101
use a lot of rhetorical devices/figurative language in .
ENG100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

she grades hard but if you ask for help outside/during class.

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews spanning years, balancing praise for and one harsh recent review. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Helpfulness

68/100

One of my favorite teachers for an english class, offers .

⚖️

34/100

I felt like it was never enough, it was confusing on what she wanted from students.

📚 Writing Workload

32/100

Her class requires lots of writing, but if you can stick with it.

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • offers
  • if you ask for help
  • Run if you can.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she grades hard
  • Many students dropped the class.
  • thought she would be hard but turned out to be very easy.

Theme 3

📝 About Assignments

  • The
  • use a lot of rhetorical devices/figurative language in your essays
  • lazy assignments.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews span 2011 to 2025 with detailed comments, but tones conflict and sample size is still modest.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1004 reviews
ENGL1011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values