AI Rate Professor

English

Leah Kaminski

ENG101 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Thin evidence suggests an average ENG101 experience with doable papers but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardYoung and eagerOpinion-heavy gradingFive papersHarvard name-droppingJust okay
  • Only one review exists, so the picture is thin and dated.
  • .
  • Student felt poetry opinions were shut down and class energy was only okay.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

, but nothing suggests a free A without solid writing work.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty feels average for ENG101 with interpretation debates and multiple papers.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

The only review rates her as just an okay professor and not someone to look forward to.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

; as ordinary for composition.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

writing load.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Student saw excitement to teach but poor handling of student opinions and constant Harvard talk.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment centers on five papers with .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single in-person ENG101 review describes an eager young teacher who is only okay, with five papers and little room for student interpretation of poetry.

Main concern

Students may feel their interpretations are dismissed in favor of the instructor's reading.

What students said

“She's a young teacher who's excited to teach, but she isn't the best.”
ENG101
“There are a total of .”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; course appears paper-driven rather than exam-driven.

Paper-based assessment
“There are a total of .”
ENG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just on "ok" prof.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, with low sample size. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“She's a young teacher who's excited to teach, but she isn't the best.”

📝 Workload Reality

55/100

“There are a total of .”

👎 Recommendation Signal

42/100

“Didn't look forward to going to her class ever.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's a young teacher who's excited to teach, but she isn't the best.
  • She goes on and on about how she went to Harvard.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There are a total of .
  • when you give your opinion on what it means you are wrong

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one old 2011 review with moderate detail, so reliability is low.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values