AI Rate Professor

Architectural Technology

Greg Tate

ARCH105 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

if you will show up and put in drawing effort; grades reward work more than talent.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful and approachableEffort-based gradingLots of drawingStrict attendanceReal-world architecture focus
  • , and very willing to help until you understand.
  • if you put in effort, especially for non-architecture majors.
  • Expect heavy drawing packets and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students say if you complete drawing work, especially as a non-major.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Content difficulty is low, but drawing packets and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and after class, and missing once creates a ton of .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

Most , and approachability.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

Described as an and effort, while still pushing architecture majors.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Easy overall class but two design drawing packets and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Strong praise for help and real-world framing, with one note that lectures can be boring book reading.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Grades center on design drawing packets and ongoing work rather than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ARCH105 is approachable and fair on effort, with lots of drawing work and , though .

Main concern

and drawing load can pile up.

What students said

“He?s an as long as you put in the time and effort to do your work.”
ARCH105
“ because if you miss one, there is ton of work you need to make and after class.”
ARCH105
“By far one of the .”
ARCH105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize design drawing work and .

Drawing packetsEffort-based gradingNo clear exam policy stated

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; assessment is framed around drawing packets and effort.

Drawing packetsEffort-based grading
“Nice teacher. but a lot of drawing (2 packet of design).”
ARCH105
“grades based on effort (for non-ARCH majors) which I found to be really fair IMO.”
ARCH105

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He?s an as long as you put in the time and effort to do your work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person ARCH105 , and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“By far one of the .”

⚖️ Effort-Based Grades

84/100

“He?s an as long as you put in the time and effort to do your work.”

📌

18/100

“ and after class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very helpful and nice.
  • Relates everything to real world applications
  • His lecture is boring because he just read it off the book

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but a lot of drawing (2 packet of design).
  • What you put in will determine your grade.
  • He?s an as long as you put in the time and effort to do your work.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and always there to help you....
  • huge plus in my book.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Four consistent 2011 in-person reviews give a but limited sample and age lower the score.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARCH1054 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values