AI Rate Professor

English

Kimberly Samaniego

ESL199 · ENG101 · ESL155 · ESL160 · ELSE155 · ESLA155 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

unless you want a tough ESL or English class and can handle uneven teaching and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing ESL instructorReads from the bookUnfair essay gradingTough but helpful for serious studentsLazy and confusing lectures
  • Reviews are sharply split between harsh critics and students who credit real grammar gains.
  • , and unfair on essay ideas versus perfect grammar.
  • Serious workers who want structure may gain; easy-A seekers should stay away.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Students report and , so an A takes real work and clear ideas, not just correct grammar.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, but , and pacing make the course feel hard for many.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

About half urge students to stay away while if you are serious about learning.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Multiple students call grading difficult or unfair, .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

ENG and ESL sections mention homework, essays, projects, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

some praise real learning and help, .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades mix essays, projects, activities, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person ESL and English sections draw extreme praise and extreme criticism: some call her excellent for grammar basics, others say she is lazy, confuses, and grades unfairly.

Main concern

Unclear lectures, book reading, and .

What students said

“ .. So lazy.. None professional.”
ESL155
“she was a great and excellent teacher I have ever had.”
ESLA155
“IF YOUR LOOKING FOR AN EASY CLASS....STAY AWAY...SHE'S TOUGH”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as hard; success depends on class attention, and essay standards feel strict.

Hard examsListen in classEssay grading strict

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tough essay standards without clear open-book or proctoring details.

Hard examsEssay-heavy grading
“The so in the class listen up and ask the questions at that time.”
ESL155
“If your gramamar is perfect but your idea is not clear , you will get C or D for that.”
ESL160

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please!!! if she is going to be the teacher. She does not teach ESL well. It's very difficult to understand her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 in-person reviews spanning 2008-2011, highlighting polarized teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Polarized Teaching Quality

45/100

“Nonprofessional teacher.the way of and confusing.”

⚖️

28/100

“If your gramamar is perfect but your idea is not clear , you will get C or D for that.”

👍 Praise From Serious Learners

70/100

“if u r serious to study. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • just read form the book
  • unclear and confusing
  • She does not teach ESL well

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • SHE'S TOUGH
  • very difficulty in grading

Theme 3

❤️

  • if u r serious to study.
  • STAY AWAY FROM HER!!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen detailed but old (2008-2011) in-person reviews show a consistent split, so the but outdated.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ESL1556 reviews
ESL1603 reviews
ELSE1552 reviews
ENG1011 review
ESL1991 review
Show 1 more courses
ESLA1551 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values