AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Marc Baer

PHILA120 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Run from this professor; students report confusion and no useful answers.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNever Answers QuestionsConfuses StudentsUncreative LecturesWorst ProfessorAvoid
  • He talks through class without creativity and often seems lost.
  • He never answers student questions and confuses the room.
  • Student strongly advises against taking him.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

High difficulty and constant confusion make earning a strong grade very costly.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty 4 plus a professor who confuses students makes the content .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Student calls him the worst and .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

No positive grading comments and .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload details are sparse; main pain is lecture quality rather than volume.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Uncreative lectures, never answers questions, confuses students, and often looks lost.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

65/100

Reviews focus on , so exams likely drive risk.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person PHILA120 felt confusing with unhelpful lectures and unanswered questions.

Main concern

Professor confuses students and rarely answers questions.

What students said

“ . He is the worst.”
PHILA120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, but .

Confusing lectures

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules for in-person PHILA120.

Confusing instruction
“ and nearly half the time, he look lost.”
PHILA120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . He is the worst.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review from 2011. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫

8/100

“ . He is the worst.”

🎯 Teaching Failure

12/100

“He NEVER answer your question”

😕 Student Confusion

12/100

“ and nearly half the time, he look lost.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • professor that talked throughout the semester (uncreative)
  • He NEVER answer your question

Theme 2

💔 About Student Experience

  • and nearly half the time, he look lost.
  • He is the worst.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only one strongly negative 2011 review with no grade or .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHILA1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values