AI Rate Professor

English

Julia Glassman

ENGLI100 · ENG100 · ENG101 · ENG801 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you have no other option and are ready for a stressful, high-effort English course.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerGPA riskUnclear assignmentsDry lecturesStrict attendanceHeavy writing load
  • Many students report and biased or
  • Lectures feel dry and unresponsive, with weak answers to questions
  • A few students say she improves writing, but most strongly advise against her

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even with effort, many report harsh or .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and unclear prompts make the class feel harder than a standard intro English course.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Students report and pressure to attend every class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most reviews urge students to stay away due to GPA risk, boredom, and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students describe biased grading and GPA damage .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Lots of writing and free writes create steady work, though not always overwhelming volume.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Common complaints are unclear answers, dry delivery, robotic style, and weak assignment guidance.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and writing process rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person English courses are often described as , and GPA-damaging, with .

Main concern

, and GPA damage dominate student warnings.

What students said

“she literally ruined my gpa. . she will kill your gpa.”
ENG100
“ !”
ENG801
“she is tough, but in a way that makes you a better thinker and a much more lucid writer.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is writing-heavy with ; .

Heavy writing focusUnclear promptsDiscussion-based classNo clear proctoring notes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment relies on papers and free writes with .

Heavy writing focusUnclear prompts
“I was never, ever able to relate to the prompt she ”
ENG100
“there's alot of writing involved”
ENG100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she literally ruined my gpa. . she will kill your gpa. it will go down. because she is very biased”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person reviews, highlighting GPA risk and teaching frustration. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

24/100

“she will single handedly ruin your life, seriously, shes the life.”

🗣️ Clarity Problems

28/100

“when asked a question she doesnt know how to answer it.and says "yea sure","sure sure" all the time.”

✍️ Writing Pressure

40/100

“she will push you to be a better writer. She'll drive you absolutely nuts”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very dry and says "sure,sure" a lot
  • Almost like a robot
  • sucks the life out of you

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she literally ruined my gpa
  • Though i got an A, totally not fun at all
  • if you miss more then 4 classes

Theme 3

📝 About Writing Work

  • there's alot of writing involved
  • ended up pulling most, if not all, the free writes and
  • Helped me improve alot as far as organization goes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve mostly negative in-person reviews are consistent on frustration and difficulty, but sample size is moderate and older.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG1006 reviews
ENG1012 reviews
ENG8012 reviews
ENGLI1002 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values