AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Greg Fry

CSC191 · MATH220 · MATH191 · MATH210 · MATH190 · 223 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
59%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want to learn deeply and , and steady practice.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHelpful office hoursTest heavyLots of homeworkClear videosTough grading
  • and office hour help.
  • The main risk is a .
  • Online reviews are more polarized because proctoring, workload, and self-teaching concerns appear more often.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible, but most comments say it takes steady practice, office hours, and .

Online evidence is harsher because several students say tests dominate the grade, while and some replacement flexibility.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content is concept-heavy and often difficult even .

Both formats describe challenging material, but online students more often report self-teaching pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

65/100

Attendance rules are not clearly emphasized, and many reviews focus instead , and exams.

Online evidence centers on asynchronous videos and Zoom help, while and class lectures.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and support, but many warn against him because of exams and workload.

, while online reviews show stronger warnings about stress and testing.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

as fair by supporters but harsh and solution methods.

Format shift

Online reviews contain more tough-grader complaints, while .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Weekly quizzes, frequent practice, videos, and .

Format shift

Online winter and calculus reviews describe the workload as especially intense, while .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Many students say and gives strong office hour help, despite some complaints about rambling or poor lectures.

Format shift

Online teaching depends more on videos and Zoom help, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades are frequently , and limited graded categories.

Format shift

Online reviews especially stress test-heavy grading, while as .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and take-home quizzes, though and drop stories remain a major risk.

Main concern

You need consistent practice because exams can be difficult .

What students said

“The and you could replace a bad one, which helped.”
MATH220
“ .”
MATH220
“This was a hard class. This professor was good at explaining it all.”
MATH210

Remote format

Online

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report helpful videos and office hours, but many also , and .

Main concern

Online sections can feel high-stakes because exams and .

What students said

“ hands.”
MATH210
“ .”
MATH220
“Easy A if you pay attention to his lectures and try out some of the .”
MATH220

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because and some online proctoring requirements.

Test HeavyLockdown Browser WebcamGradescope SubmissionNo Cheat SheetNo CalculatorHard Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and some no-calculator or no-cheat-sheet rules, but also mention take-home quizzes as preparation.

Hard ExamsTake-Home QuizzesNo CalculatorNo Cheat SheetMultiple Finals
“No cheat sheet, calculator, or .”
191
“ .”
MATH220
“ that you get every week.”
MATH220

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention proctored exams, Lockdown Browser with webcam, Gradescope submission, no cheat sheets or calculators, and .

Lockdown Browser WebcamGradescope SubmissionNo Cheat SheetNo CalculatorTest Heavy
“ hands.”
MATH210
“No cheat sheets or ”
CSC191
“4 exams are 80% of grade, and .”
MATH210

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His class was tough, but if you work on it you can do well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

Teaching Quality

76/100

“He will answer any question and .”

35/100

“ .”

Workload Cost

35/100

“Good class, but will keep you busy.”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • This professor was good at explaining it all.
  • and if you talk to him.

Theme 2

Difficulty and Grades

  • Class isn't hard conceptually, but you have to put in much more effort than in another class to get the same grade.
  • The problems on the .
  • Easy A if you pay attention to his lectures and try out some of the .

Theme 3

Support and Office Hours

  • He had online office hours which worked well for my schedule, very good at answering questions.
  • He spent a lot of time helping me understand.
  • he stayed late if you had more questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

223

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 50 recent reviews across both formats with detailed and consistent themes about teaching, workload, and exams.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5136
4 out of 518
3 out of 517
2 out of 526
1 out of 527

Course coverage

MATH22018 reviews
MATH21011 reviews
1919 reviews
MATH1916 reviews
1903 reviews
Show 2 more courses
MATH1902 reviews
CSC1911 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

49 reported outcomes

A range

20

A 20

B range

14

B 14

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

11

Drop/Withdrawal 6 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2