AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Junko Forbes

MATH40 · MATH030 · MAT150 · MATH120 · MATH150 · STATC1000 · 53 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take her if you want a supportive math professor and are willing to keep up with and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring Math SupportClear ExplanationsHeavy HomeworkExtra CreditStrict Online Exams
  • Students consistently describe her as , and strong at explaining math to anxious or weaker students.
  • Grades are fair and often boosted by , study guides, cheat sheets, grade replacement, and office-hour support.
  • The main drawbacks , and strict online exam proctoring in several reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is very possible with , and grade replacement, but students repeatedly say math still requires steady work and .

, while online reviews mention heavier workload and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The content is still real college math or statistics with many topics, formulas, quizzes, and exams, even though .

Both formats describe difficult math made clearer by teaching, with online reviews more often calling the workload long and hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Attendance policy is not clearly strict, but office hours, lectures, and .

Online reviews emphasize self-pacing and communication, while , and asking for help.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Most students recommend her because she is caring and clear, but workload, paid platforms, and .

, though online recommendations are more polarized because of workload and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

She offers , study guides, cheat sheets, and lowest-test replacement, but .

Format shift

, while online reviews include more complaints about strict or .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Workload is heavy because many students mention lots of homework, weekly quizzes, Pearson or MyStatLab assignments, discussions, and .

Format shift

Online reviews stress the workload most, while as necessary.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Her teaching is widely praised as , and supportive, especially for students afraid of math.

Format shift

Both formats support strong teaching, though online lectures receive a few complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

66/100

, and a final, with several reviews noting test-heavy weight.

Format shift

Online reviews more often mention proctored tests and , while , and practice work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly , and grade support, though students still say math and statistics require real practice.

Main concern

In-person students should expect practice-heavy math with , and sometimes a .

What students said

“She if you are scared of math!”
MATH120
“The and can be taken multiple times until completed with 100%.”
MAT150
“grade got ruined by the final thats worth 30 percent of your grade.”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise her kindness, clarity, and flexibility, but they more often warn about heavy homework, paid Pearson or MyStatLab access, and .

Main concern

Online students , and Lockdown Browser or camera-based exams.

What students said

“Tests aren't on zoom and are on lockdown browser, so .”
MAT150
“unless this is your only class with .”
MAT150
“Stats is no way easy and you will have to work for your grade.”
MATH150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because some students get cheat sheets and grade replacement while others report Lockdown Browser, camera and microphone requirements, and a .

Cheat Sheet AllowedLockdown BrowserWebcam and Mic ProctoringFinal Worth 30 PercentLowest Midterm Replacement

Assessment risk

Varies

47/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support , and a , but they do not clearly prove a universal proctoring policy.

Cheat Sheet AllowedStudy GuidesExtra Credit on TestsFinal Worth 30 Percent
“1 8.5 x 11 in cheat sheet allowed for .”
MATH120
“Every test, she gives 8% .”
MAT150
“grade got ruined by the final thats worth 30 percent of your grade.”
MATH150

Online

Online reviews explicitly support Lockdown Browser, webcam or , and a 30 percent final in statistics.

Lockdown BrowserWebcam and Mic ProctoringCheat Sheet AllowedFinal Worth 30 PercentCumulative Final
“ and are on lockdown browser,”
MAT150
“she uses lockdown browser for her test so mic and camera on at all times.”
MAT150
“The AND microphone on.”
MAT150
“Can use cheat sheet for perfect.”
MATH150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She if you are scared of math!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“She was so .”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“There are 7 different topics, but there manageable as long as u actually study.”

⚖️

47/100

“Grade is very test heavy (final alone is 30%) so study well for the three tests!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and surely.
  • and straight to the point.
  • She is the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • As long as you do the homework and try hard, you'll probably get an A.
  • Stats is no way easy and you will have to work for your grade.
  • The only real "hard" part of her class is the online quizzes.

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload & Cost

  • a lot of homework, but manageable.
  • Be prepared to pay for homework as well because PEARSON is expensive.
  • she makes us pay for this website called mystatlab that cost 85$.

Theme 4

🧪 About Exams

  • Tests aren't on zoom and are on lockdown browser, so .
  • and the learned
  • 1 8.5 x 11 in cheat sheet allowed for .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

53

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across several years and both formats give detailed, consistent evidence , and exams.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 539
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH15019 reviews
MAT15016 reviews
MATH12010 reviews
MATH402 reviews
STATC10002 reviews
Show 1 more courses
MATH0301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

25

A+ 7 · A 14 · A- 4

B range

11

B+ 2 · B 8 · B- 1

C range

5

C+ 2 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1