AI Rate Professor

Art

Andrea Bronte

ART200 · ART101 · ARTHISTORY · ART1O1 · ART110 · 49 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
58.14%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Take Andrea Bronte only if you want rigorous art training and , and regular participation.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy WorkloadClear FeedbackAttendance MattersPolarizing Teaching
  • Students often learn real art skills, but many say the workload and .
  • Online reviews are especially split between organized, clear modules and .
  • Attendance and participation matter heavily, especially in in-person studio and art history classes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Many students earn A grades, but comments repeatedly say the A requires , and tolerance for .

, while in-person evidence stresses attendance, participation, and tough critique.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course content is often described as college-level, skill-building, reading-heavy, and much harder than students expect from art.

Online courses are challenging because of compressed modules and writing load, while because of studio practice, critique, and lecture pace.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as important, with several reviews warning that absences cause missed material or even course consequences.

In-person reviews give the strongest attendance evidence, while online reviews mostly mention .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

and feedback, but many warn against her because of , and tone.

Both formats are polarized, but online reviews show sharper complaints about workload and support.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

as tough, specific, and sometimes harsh, even when students acknowledge clear criteria.

Format shift

Online students and assignments, while in-person students emphasize tough critiques and .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Workload is heavy, with , and multi-hour assignments across many reviews.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are more intense, especially in short terms, while and attendance.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Teaching is polarizing because many students praise her feedback and skill-building while .

Format shift

Online reviews praise organization but complain about support, while and growth but complain about tone.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Assessment , and occasional large exams rather than relying only on tests.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions, quizzes, papers, and large exams, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person classes often build real skills through critique and practice, but , and .

Main concern

The main concern is that missing class or lacking prior confidence can make the course feel harsh and discouraging.

What students said

“ , and knows how to push .”
ART110
“She grades pretty harshly and is pretty discouraging”
ART110
“ miss three classes”
ART101

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online and clear, but many students report , and harsh grading.

Main concern

The main concern is heavy online workload with and slow or limited support in some reviews.

What students said

“Discussions were writing 5-paragraph papers.”
ARTHISTORY
“It was explained step by step and it was very understandable and .”
ART101
“between 5-9 assignments due every other day”
ART110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and quizzes, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Long Written ExamParagraph-Based ExamHeavy ReadingQuizzes Not Clearly Traditional

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a six-hour test, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Difficult TestLong Written TestFinal Presentation Attendance
“be prepared for a six-hour, 50+ paragraph test”
ART101
“ .”
ART101
“If from the course.”
5016

Online

Online reviews mention very long written exams and quiz-like writing tasks, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Long Written ExamParagraph-Based ExamWriting-Heavy Quizzes
“Exam was finding 45 works of art and writing 45 paragraphs worth 250 pts.”
ARTHISTORY
“one casual exam my class took had us write 45 PARAGRAPHS”
ART101
“Quizzes are more 5 paragraph papers.”
ARTHISTORY

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I learned a lot but had to make sure I did all of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 49 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ , and knows how to push .”

⚖️

25/100

“She is a and and her one group project.”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“ and several hours long videos to watch.”

👍 Recommendation Split

55/100

“ and !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I learned so much from this class and I'm !
  • She can also just be very rude and condescending to her students.
  • The learning environment was safe and accepting and I felt comfortable to learn.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It is 100% not an easy A so be weary.
  • but also fair and honest.
  • She grades ridiculously hard and if you want her to help you, she's rude.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Please be ready to have lots of work each week IT DOES NOT STOP TILL THE END OF THE SEMESTER.
  • if it is the only thing you plan to do with your study time.
  • It does take practice, consistent attendance, and spending the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

49

Recent reviews read by the AI

49

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 49 reviews span many years and both formats, with , and teaching style.

Inside 49 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 55
3 out of 55
2 out of 54
1 out of 513

Course coverage

ART10129 reviews
ART11010 reviews
ARTHISTORY5 reviews
ART1O13 reviews
50161 review
Show 1 more courses
ART2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

23

A 21 · A- 2

B range

16

B+ 6 · B 8 · B- 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1