AI Rate Professor

English

Elice Hennessee

1C · ENGL1C · 1A · ENG1B · ENG1C · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want to become a stronger writer and can tolerate heavy work and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEffective writing teacherNot an easy AHeavy reading and papersHelpful feedbackSlow grading and email delays
  • Students often say she improves their writing, especially in in-person classes.
  • The class , and strict deadlines.
  • A major risk is delayed grading or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Students repeatedly say it is not an easy A, and , and meeting deadlines.

Online evidence shows grading uncertainty, while serious work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The writing concepts are teachable but the , and higher-level expectations make the course challenging.

Online reviews focus on workload and , while but effective writing development.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Comments warn that skipping class, missing assignments, or being late will hurt performance.

Attendance pressure is supported mainly by in-person reviews; online reviews mention participation but .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Most students recommend her because she teaches writing effectively, but and communication keep the recommendation from being universal.

, while online reviews are mixed because of and rushed grading.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and sometimes delayed, with several students reporting uncertainty about essay scores until late.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews emphasize that the class is not an easy A.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students mention lots of , and heavy work across multiple reviews.

Format shift

Both formats show heavy work, with online reviews calling it heavy and , and reading.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Her teaching is often described as , and writing-focused despite communication and structure issues.

Format shift

, while online reviews are more mixed because of delayed replies and grading.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and participation rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

and papers as the main assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are more positive, , and a challenging but rewarding workload.

Main concern

The course is not an easy A and , and papers.

What students said

“She is not an easy A but you will be become an amazing writer by taking her class.”
1C
“It's NOT an easy "A," but she IS effective.”
ENGL1C
“ because she does not let you turn them in again.”
1A

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but repeatedly criticize delayed grades, slow email replies, and heavy work.

Main concern

Students may not know their standing until late because grades and .

What students said

“ , and the instructions and sample essays are helpful guides for completing the work.”
1A
“The Topics were interesting, but .”
1A
“Just be aware that .”
1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and assessment appears mostly writing-based with .

Final mentionedEssay-based assessmentExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book exams.

Final mentionedExam policy not clearly proven
“She gave the but said it was going to be due 3 days before.”
ENGL1C

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, quiz, midterm, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It's NOT an easy "A," but she IS effective.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Even though it's a higher level class, it was the first Engl class that actually taught me how to write!”

📈 A Difficulty

38/100

“She is not an easy A but you will be become an amazing writer by taking her class.”

⚠️

32/100

“she didn't grade a single essay so you never knew.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her teaching methods are extremely effective and she is always willing to help you out.
  • She makes you challenge yourself but she is honestly the .
  • .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Grades

  • It's NOT an easy "A," but she IS effective.
  • Work is heavy.
  • You do about 4 essays, 1 being research paper, so keep that in mind.

Theme 3

📩 About Communication

  • Never answered emails in a timely manner.
  • Good responses when emailing.
  • Just be aware that .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across several years give detailed and mostly consistent evidence , and communication.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

1A5 reviews
1C2 reviews
ENG1C2 reviews
ENGL1C2 reviews
ENG1B1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values