AI Rate Professor

English

Kim Runkle

ENGL6515 · ENG1A · ENGLISH1C · ENGLI6523 · ENGL1C · ABBABB · ENGL6523 · ENGLI6504 · ENG1C · 66 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take her if and , but avoid her if you need an easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDetailed FeedbackTough Essay GraderClear ExpectationsWriting ImprovementHeavy Papers
  • Students often say her feedback improves their writing, even when it feels harsh.
  • The course content is usually manageable, but earning an A can be difficult because .
  • Online reviews are more positive and describe clearer support, while and grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Getting an A is possible, but most students , and accepting strict feedback.

Online evidence is more forgiving, while are hard to earn.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The material is not usually described as conceptually hard, but the writing demands and debate work make it feel demanding.

Online students describe manageable assignments, while , and exams.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, though some flexibility exists through absences, late passes, or extensions.

, while online reviews do not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Students recommend her for real writing improvement, but the .

Online reviews are mostly enthusiastic, while because of .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Many students call her a tough or the feedback.

Format shift

Online grading comments are mixed, while .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The workload , and exams, though online students often found it manageable.

Format shift

Online workload is described as not overwhelming, while and frequent writing.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Her strongest , and visible writing improvement despite some complaints about tone.

Format shift

Online reviews are consistently positive about support, while and frustration with harsh delivery.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears centered on essays and , and participation.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most assessment details, while and discussions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students report strong writing growth and organization, but , and .

Main concern

and frequent writing make the class stressful for grade-focused students.

What students said

“Be prepared to work for your grade.”
ENG1C
“She helped me to gain confidence in writing essays :)”
ENGL1C
“She grades hard!”
ENG1C

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students mostly , and a manageable workload, with one strong complaint about hard grading.

Main concern

assignments are clear.

What students said

“As long as you put in the effort, getting an A is not hard.”
ENGL1C
“Practically impossible to get an A.”
ENG1C
“The workload was never overwhelming”
ENG1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and debates, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

EssaysMidtermFinalDebateQuizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention essays, a , and debates, but .

EssaysMidtermFinalPop QuizzesDebate
“Her class consist of and debate.”
ENG1C
“There's 4 major essays, a , and a .”
ENG1C

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book rules, or a .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She may be a , but that's because she really cares about her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She helped me to gain confidence in writing essays :)”

⚖️

28/100

“Practically impossible to get an A.”

📝 Workload Reality

35/100

“You have to write a lot in that class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and and super clear.
  • She gave great feedback on the rough draft to prepare me.
  • She is easy to get in contact with at all times.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Be prepared to work for your grade.
  • .
  • Difficult to earn an A if you are not great with essays.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • There and a debate.
  • You have to write a lot of essays and there's a debate towards the end of the semester as well as a midterm and final.
  • The workload was never overwhelming

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

66

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years give strong evidence, though .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 533
4 out of 510
3 out of 513
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ENG1C32 reviews
ENGL1C7 reviews
ENGLISH1C3 reviews
ENG1A2 reviews
65021 review
Show 5 more courses
ABBABB1 review
ENGL65151 review
ENGL65231 review
ENGLI65041 review
ENGLI65231 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 4 · A 7

B range

5

B 4 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1